PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • Most of research on destination governance focuses on reporting the results of single case studies, whose findings are often related to the particularities of the specific destinations considered. As a result, there is little (empirical) consistency in underlying principles and dimensions of destination governance. To overcome this gap, this paper presents a combined (re-)analysis of multiple qualitative case studies and empirically develops destination governance dimensions from a practitioner point of view. Findings show that theoretical conceptualisation of destination governance and practical foci differ in some respects: In contrast to governance theory, practitioners refer more to context, process and change. (xsd:string)
is ?:citation of
?:citation
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2017 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2017 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.5281/zenodo.401371 ()
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 2529-1947 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • The practice of destination governance: a comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:reference
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing, 3, 2017, 1, 18-24 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-67226-7 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 3 (xsd:string)