PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • Qualitative content analysis in reception studies, especially in the context of empirical research in literary learning, faces a double hermeneutic challenge. In this article, we address this challenge by providing guidelines to choose appropriate context units and modify the types of category-building provided by standard introductions to qualitative content analysis. The categories are adapted to the needs of literary reception researchers by differentiating between strictly formal and theory-based formal categories, both of which are frequently applied in literary reception studies in order to reconstruct either processes or underlying dispositions. (xsd:string)
is ?:citation of
?:citation
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2020 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2020 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.17169/fqs-21.1.3428 ()
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • de (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 1438-5627 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse in der literaturdidaktischen Rezeptionsforschung: über die Herausforderung, Verstehensprozesse zu verstehen (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:reference
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 21, 2020, 1, 24 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:volumeNumber
  • 21 (xsd:string)