PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • In this article, I take a closer look at the debate that has arisen from 1. the massive changes that qualitative and interpretive social research have undergone in recent years and 2. the associated, clear increase in new methodological approaches. I outline two ideal-typical positions -the order-oriented police and the quality insurance personnel- to make salient again the common foundations of these approaches. A proposal is then presented for a cross-method practice for securing quality - which essentially exists in the use of qualitative/interpretive methods as the teaching of an art. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2019 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2019 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.17169/fqs-20.1.3205 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • de (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 1438-5627 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Methodenpolizei oder Gütesicherung? Zwei Deutungsmuster im Kampf um die Vorherrschaft in der qualitativen Sozialforschung (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20, 2019, 1, 15 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-61265-4 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 20 (xsd:string)