RDF Graph Measures for the Analysis of RDF Graphs

Home / Cross domain / sandrart-net

Measures

Notation Description Value
m graph volume (no. of edges) 147,968
n graph size (no. of vertices) 75,124
dmax max degree 9,564
d+max max in-degree 9,564
d-max max out-degree 1,027
z mean total degree 3.939
h+
h-index, respecting in-degree
Known from citation networks, this measure is an indicator for the importance of a vertex in the graph, similar to a centrality measure. A value of h means that for the number of h vertices the degree of these vertices is greater or equal to h. A high value of h could be an indicator for a "dense" graph and that its vertices are more "prestigious". The value is computed by respecting the in-degree distribution of the graph, denoted as h+.
47
h h-index, respecting total degree 70
pmu fill, respecting unique edges only 0
p fill, respecting overall edges 0
mp
parallel edges
Based on the measure mu, this is the number of parallel edges, i.e., the total number of edges that share the same pair of source and target vertices. It is computed by subtracting mu from the total number of edges m, i.e. mp = m – mu.
24
mu
unique edges
In RDF, a pair of subject and object resources may be described with more than one predicate. Hence, in the graphs, there may exist a fraction of all edges that share the same pair of (subject and object) vertices. The value for mu represents the total number of edges without counting these multiple edges between a pair of vertices.
147,944
y reciprocity 0.121
δ
Effective measure!Score: 0.08

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

diameter (approximated)
The diameter is the longest shortest path between a pair of two vertices in the graph (as there can be more than one path for the pair of vertices). As this requires all possible paths to be computed, this is a very computational intensive measure. We used the pseudo_diameter-algorithm provided by graph-tool, which is an approximation method for the diameter of the graph. As the graph can have many components, this algorithm very often returns the value of 1. If this should be the case for this graph, we compute the diameter for the largest connecting component.
16
PR max pagerank value 0.01
Cd+ max in-degree centrality 0.127
Cd- max out-degree centrality 0.014
Cd max degree centrality 0.127
α powerlaw exponent, degree distribution 4.037
dminα dmin for α 10
α+ powerlaw exponent, in-degree distribution 2.554
dminα+ dmin for α+ 5
σ+ standard deviation, in-degree distribution 58.714
σ- standard deviation, out-degree distribution 5.538
cv+ coefficient variation, in-degree distribution 2,980.95
cv- coefficient variation, out-degree distribution 281.163
σ2+ variance, in-degree distribution 3,447.362
σ2- variance, out-degree distribution 30.669
C+d graph centralization 0.127
z-
Effective measure!Score: 0.055

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

mean out-degree 4.275
$$deg^{--}(G)$$ max partial out-degree 873
$$\overline{deg^{--}}(G)$$ mean partial out-degree 1.273
$$deg^-_L(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.062

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max labelled out-degree 14
$$\overline{deg^-_L}(G)$$ mean labelled out-degree 3.36
$$deg^-_D(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.082

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max direct out-degree 1,027
$$\overline{deg^-_D}(G)$$ mean direct out-degree 4.275
z+ mean in-degree 2.167
$$deg^{++}(G)$$ max partial in-degree 9,564
$$\overline{deg^{++}}(G)$$ mean partial in-degree 1.761
$$deg^+_L(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.08

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max labelled in-degree 9
$$\overline{deg^+_L}(G)$$ mean labelled in-degree 1.231
$$deg^+_D(G)$$ max direct in-degree 9,564
$$\overline{deg^+_D}(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.057

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

mean direct in-degree 2.167
$$deg_P(G)$$ max predicate degree 49,003
$$\overline{deg_P}(G)$$ mean predicate degree 4,352
$$deg^+_P(G)$$ max predicate in-degree 34,362
$$\overline{deg^+_P}(G)$$ mean predicate in-degree 3,419.853
$$deg^-_P(G)$$ max predicate out-degree 14,817
$$\overline{deg^-_P}(G)$$ mean predicate out-degree 2,471.118
$$\propto_{s-o}(G)$$ subject-object ratio 0.37
$$r_L(G)$$ ratio of repreated predicate lists 0.97
$$deg_{PL}(G)$$ max predicate list degree 5,145
$$\overline{deg_{PL}}(G)$$ mean predicate list degree 32.93
$$C_G$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.168

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

distinct classes 26
$$S^C_G$$ all different typed subjects 34,362
$$r_T(G)$$ ratio of typed subjects 0.993

Plots

Degree distribution shown here
In-degree distribution shown here
Last update of this page: 25 March 2020 13:38:37 CET