RDF Graph Measures for the Analysis of RDF Graphs

Home / Publications / rkb-explorer-dblp

rkb-explorer-dblp

Data and Resources

Measures

Notation Description Value
m graph volume (no. of edges) 388,940
n graph size (no. of vertices) 160,720
dmax max degree 69,700
d+max max in-degree 47,719
d-max max out-degree 46,470
z mean total degree 4.84
h+
h-index, respecting in-degree
Known from citation networks, this measure is an indicator for the importance of a vertex in the graph, similar to a centrality measure. A value of h means that for the number of h vertices the degree of these vertices is greater or equal to h. A high value of h could be an indicator for a "dense" graph and that its vertices are more "prestigious". The value is computed by respecting the in-degree distribution of the graph, denoted as h+.
113
h h-index, respecting total degree 167
pmu fill, respecting unique edges only 0
p fill, respecting overall edges 0
mp
parallel edges
Based on the measure mu, this is the number of parallel edges, i.e., the total number of edges that share the same pair of source and target vertices. It is computed by subtracting mu from the total number of edges m, i.e. mp = m – mu.
105,255
mu
unique edges
In RDF, a pair of subject and object resources may be described with more than one predicate. Hence, in the graphs, there may exist a fraction of all edges that share the same pair of (subject and object) vertices. The value for mu represents the total number of edges without counting these multiple edges between a pair of vertices.
283,685
y reciprocity 0
δ
Effective measure!Score: 0.09

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

diameter (approximated)
The diameter is the longest shortest path between a pair of two vertices in the graph (as there can be more than one path for the pair of vertices). As this requires all possible paths to be computed, this is a very computational intensive measure. We used the pseudo_diameter-algorithm provided by graph-tool, which is an approximation method for the diameter of the graph. As the graph can have many components, this algorithm very often returns the value of 1. If this should be the case for this graph, we compute the diameter for the largest connecting component.
1
PR max pagerank value 0.018
Cd+ max in-degree centrality 0.297
Cd- max out-degree centrality 0.289
Cd max degree centrality 0.434
α powerlaw exponent, degree distribution 2.349
dminα dmin for α 75
α+ powerlaw exponent, in-degree distribution 2.376
dminα+ dmin for α+ 32
σ+ standard deviation, in-degree distribution 170.818
σ- standard deviation, out-degree distribution 116.167
cv+ coefficient variation, in-degree distribution 7,058.65
cv- coefficient variation, out-degree distribution 4,800.32
σ2+ variance, in-degree distribution 29,178.906
σ2- variance, out-degree distribution 13,494.754
C+d graph centralization 0.434
z-
Effective measure!Score: 0.052

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

mean out-degree 6.012
$$deg^{--}(G)$$ max partial out-degree 23,235
$$\overline{deg^{--}}(G)$$ mean partial out-degree 1.505
$$deg^-_L(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.055

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max labelled out-degree 9
$$\overline{deg^-_L}(G)$$ mean labelled out-degree 3.996
$$deg^-_D(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.063

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max direct out-degree 46
$$\overline{deg^-_D}(G)$$ mean direct out-degree 4.385
z+ mean in-degree 2.824
$$deg^{++}(G)$$ max partial in-degree 47,719
$$\overline{deg^{++}}(G)$$ mean partial in-degree 2.822
$$deg^+_L(G)$$ max labelled in-degree 2
$$\overline{deg^+_L}(G)$$ mean labelled in-degree 1.001
$$deg^+_D(G)$$ max direct in-degree 40,925
$$\overline{deg^+_D}(G)$$ mean direct in-degree 2.06
$$deg_P(G)$$ max predicate degree 117,240
$$\overline{deg_P}(G)$$ mean predicate degree 19,447
$$deg^+_P(G)$$ max predicate in-degree 64,689
$$\overline{deg^+_P}(G)$$ mean predicate in-degree 12,925
$$deg^-_P(G)$$ max predicate out-degree 40,618
$$\overline{deg^-_P}(G)$$ mean predicate out-degree 6,891.05
$$\propto_{s-o}(G)$$ subject-object ratio 0.259
$$r_L(G)$$ ratio of repreated predicate lists 0.995
$$deg_{PL}(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.062

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max predicate list degree 36,738
$$\overline{deg_{PL}}(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.231

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

mean predicate list degree 193.68
$$C_G$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.048

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

distinct classes 10
$$S^C_G$$ all different typed subjects 64,689
$$r_T(G)$$ ratio of typed subjects 1

Plots

Degree distribution shown here
In-degree distribution shown here
Last update of this page: 25 March 2020 13:38:39 CET