RDF Graph Measures for the Analysis of RDF Graphs

Home / Cross domain / muninn-world-war-i

muninn-world-war-i

Data and Resources

Measures

Notation Description Value
m graph volume (no. of edges) 20,314,285
n graph size (no. of vertices) 5,601,847
dmax max degree 1,121,051
d+max max in-degree 1,121,051
d-max max out-degree 763
z mean total degree 7.253
h+
h-index, respecting in-degree
Known from citation networks, this measure is an indicator for the importance of a vertex in the graph, similar to a centrality measure. A value of h means that for the number of h vertices the degree of these vertices is greater or equal to h. A high value of h could be an indicator for a "dense" graph and that its vertices are more "prestigious". The value is computed by respecting the in-degree distribution of the graph, denoted as h+.
955
h h-index, respecting total degree 956
pmu fill, respecting unique edges only 0
p fill, respecting overall edges 0
mp
parallel edges
Based on the measure mu, this is the number of parallel edges, i.e., the total number of edges that share the same pair of source and target vertices. It is computed by subtracting mu from the total number of edges m, i.e. mp = m – mu.
1,051,488
mu
unique edges
In RDF, a pair of subject and object resources may be described with more than one predicate. Hence, in the graphs, there may exist a fraction of all edges that share the same pair of (subject and object) vertices. The value for mu represents the total number of edges without counting these multiple edges between a pair of vertices.
19,262,797
y reciprocity 0.067
δ
Effective measure!Score: 0.08

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

diameter (approximated)
The diameter is the longest shortest path between a pair of two vertices in the graph (as there can be more than one path for the pair of vertices). As this requires all possible paths to be computed, this is a very computational intensive measure. We used the pseudo_diameter-algorithm provided by graph-tool, which is an approximation method for the diameter of the graph. As the graph can have many components, this algorithm very often returns the value of 1. If this should be the case for this graph, we compute the diameter for the largest connecting component.
1
PR max pagerank value 0.004
Cd+ max in-degree centrality 0.2
Cd- max out-degree centrality 0
Cd max degree centrality 0.2
α powerlaw exponent, degree distribution 1.944
dminα dmin for α 232
α+ powerlaw exponent, in-degree distribution 1.886
dminα+ dmin for α+ 5
σ+ standard deviation, in-degree distribution 978.984
σ- standard deviation, out-degree distribution 4.441
cv+ coefficient variation, in-degree distribution 26,996.4
cv- coefficient variation, out-degree distribution 122.471
σ2+ variance, in-degree distribution 958,409.158
σ2- variance, out-degree distribution 19.724
C+d graph centralization 0.2
z-
Effective measure!Score: 0.055

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

mean out-degree 7.906
$$deg^{--}(G)$$ max partial out-degree 749
$$\overline{deg^{--}}(G)$$ mean partial out-degree 1.073
$$deg^-_L(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.062

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max labelled out-degree 127
$$\overline{deg^-_L}(G)$$ mean labelled out-degree 7.369
$$deg^-_D(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.082

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max direct out-degree 761
$$\overline{deg^-_D}(G)$$ mean direct out-degree 7.497
z+ mean in-degree 4.575
$$deg^{++}(G)$$ max partial in-degree 1,121,043
$$\overline{deg^{++}}(G)$$ mean partial in-degree 3.698
$$deg^+_L(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.08

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max labelled in-degree 24
$$\overline{deg^+_L}(G)$$ mean labelled in-degree 1.237
$$deg^+_D(G)$$ max direct in-degree 1,121,049
$$\overline{deg^+_D}(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.057

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

mean direct in-degree 4.338
$$deg_P(G)$$ max predicate degree 3,681,822
$$\overline{deg_P}(G)$$ mean predicate degree 42,766.916
$$deg^+_P(G)$$ max predicate in-degree 2,569,268
$$\overline{deg^+_P}(G)$$ mean predicate in-degree 39,861.905
$$deg^-_P(G)$$ max predicate out-degree 968,239
$$\overline{deg^-_P}(G)$$ mean predicate out-degree 11,564.545
$$\propto_{s-o}(G)$$ subject-object ratio 0.251
$$r_L(G)$$ ratio of repreated predicate lists 1
$$deg_{PL}(G)$$ max predicate list degree 808,814
$$\overline{deg_{PL}}(G)$$ mean predicate list degree 2,896.676
$$C_G$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.168

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

distinct classes 157
$$S^C_G$$ all different typed subjects 2,569,268
$$r_T(G)$$ ratio of typed subjects 1

Plots

Degree distribution shown here
In-degree distribution shown here
Last update of this page: 25 March 2020 13:38:37 CET