RDF Graph Measures for the Analysis of RDF Graphs

Home / Cross domain / imagesnippets

Measures

Notation Description Value
m graph volume (no. of edges) 1,058,080
n graph size (no. of vertices) 307,407
dmax max degree 33,900
d+max max in-degree 33,900
d-max max out-degree 185
z mean total degree 6.884
h+
h-index, respecting in-degree
Known from citation networks, this measure is an indicator for the importance of a vertex in the graph, similar to a centrality measure. A value of h means that for the number of h vertices the degree of these vertices is greater or equal to h. A high value of h could be an indicator for a "dense" graph and that its vertices are more "prestigious". The value is computed by respecting the in-degree distribution of the graph, denoted as h+.
292
h h-index, respecting total degree 292
pmu fill, respecting unique edges only 0
p fill, respecting overall edges 0
mp
parallel edges
Based on the measure mu, this is the number of parallel edges, i.e., the total number of edges that share the same pair of source and target vertices. It is computed by subtracting mu from the total number of edges m, i.e. mp = m – mu.
11,479
mu
unique edges
In RDF, a pair of subject and object resources may be described with more than one predicate. Hence, in the graphs, there may exist a fraction of all edges that share the same pair of (subject and object) vertices. The value for mu represents the total number of edges without counting these multiple edges between a pair of vertices.
1,046,601
y reciprocity 0
δ
Effective measure!Score: 0.08

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

diameter (approximated)
The diameter is the longest shortest path between a pair of two vertices in the graph (as there can be more than one path for the pair of vertices). As this requires all possible paths to be computed, this is a very computational intensive measure. We used the pseudo_diameter-algorithm provided by graph-tool, which is an approximation method for the diameter of the graph. As the graph can have many components, this algorithm very often returns the value of 1. If this should be the case for this graph, we compute the diameter for the largest connecting component.
1
PR max pagerank value 0.01
Cd+ max in-degree centrality 0.11
Cd- max out-degree centrality 0.001
Cd max degree centrality 0.11
α powerlaw exponent, degree distribution 2.052
dminα dmin for α 91
α+ powerlaw exponent, in-degree distribution 1.956
dminα+ dmin for α+ 12
σ+ standard deviation, in-degree distribution 144.209
σ- standard deviation, out-degree distribution 8.894
cv+ coefficient variation, in-degree distribution 4,189.74
cv- coefficient variation, out-degree distribution 258.399
σ2+ variance, in-degree distribution 20,796.179
σ2- variance, out-degree distribution 79.103
C+d graph centralization 0.11
z-
Effective measure!Score: 0.055

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

mean out-degree 6.839
$$deg^{--}(G)$$ max partial out-degree 104
$$\overline{deg^{--}}(G)$$ mean partial out-degree 1.724
$$deg^-_L(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.062

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max labelled out-degree 175
$$\overline{deg^-_L}(G)$$ mean labelled out-degree 3.967
$$deg^-_D(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.082

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max direct out-degree 185
$$\overline{deg^-_D}(G)$$ mean direct out-degree 6.765
z+ mean in-degree 4.414
$$deg^{++}(G)$$ max partial in-degree 33,900
$$\overline{deg^{++}}(G)$$ mean partial in-degree 4.275
$$deg^+_L(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.08

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max labelled in-degree 12
$$\overline{deg^+_L}(G)$$ mean labelled in-degree 1.032
$$deg^+_D(G)$$ max direct in-degree 33,900
$$\overline{deg^+_D}(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.057

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

mean direct in-degree 4.366
$$deg_P(G)$$ max predicate degree 382,152
$$\overline{deg_P}(G)$$ mean predicate degree 2,208.935
$$deg^+_P(G)$$ max predicate in-degree 60,375
$$\overline{deg^+_P}(G)$$ mean predicate in-degree 1,281.334
$$deg^-_P(G)$$ max predicate out-degree 33,903
$$\overline{deg^-_P}(G)$$ mean predicate out-degree 516.697
$$\propto_{s-o}(G)$$ subject-object ratio 0.283
$$r_L(G)$$ ratio of repreated predicate lists 0.948
$$deg_{PL}(G)$$ max predicate list degree 33,903
$$\overline{deg_{PL}}(G)$$ mean predicate list degree 19.134
$$C_G$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.168

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

distinct classes 740
$$S^C_G$$ all different typed subjects 60,375
$$r_T(G)$$ ratio of typed subjects 0.39

Plots

Degree distribution shown here
In-degree distribution shown here
Last update of this page: 25 March 2020 13:38:37 CET