RDF Graph Measures for the Analysis of RDF Graphs

Home / Government / hellenic-fire-brigade

hellenic-fire-brigade

Data and Resources

Measures

Notation Description Value
m graph volume (no. of edges) 4,165,847
n graph size (no. of vertices) 765,293
dmax max degree 712,803
d+max max in-degree 712,803
d-max max out-degree 3,672
z mean total degree 10.887
h+
h-index, respecting in-degree
Known from citation networks, this measure is an indicator for the importance of a vertex in the graph, similar to a centrality measure. A value of h means that for the number of h vertices the degree of these vertices is greater or equal to h. A high value of h could be an indicator for a "dense" graph and that its vertices are more "prestigious". The value is computed by respecting the in-degree distribution of the graph, denoted as h+.
357
h h-index, respecting total degree 431
pmu fill, respecting unique edges only 0
p fill, respecting overall edges 0
mp
Effective measure!Score: 0.045

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

parallel edges
Based on the measure mu, this is the number of parallel edges, i.e., the total number of edges that share the same pair of source and target vertices. It is computed by subtracting mu from the total number of edges m, i.e. mp = m – mu.
1,781,511
mu
unique edges
In RDF, a pair of subject and object resources may be described with more than one predicate. Hence, in the graphs, there may exist a fraction of all edges that share the same pair of (subject and object) vertices. The value for mu represents the total number of edges without counting these multiple edges between a pair of vertices.
2,384,336
y reciprocity 0
δ
diameter (approximated)
The diameter is the longest shortest path between a pair of two vertices in the graph (as there can be more than one path for the pair of vertices). As this requires all possible paths to be computed, this is a very computational intensive measure. We used the pseudo_diameter-algorithm provided by graph-tool, which is an approximation method for the diameter of the graph. As the graph can have many components, this algorithm very often returns the value of 1. If this should be the case for this graph, we compute the diameter for the largest connecting component.
1
PR max pagerank value 0.007
Cd+ max in-degree centrality 0.931
Cd- max out-degree centrality 0.005
Cd max degree centrality 0.931
α powerlaw exponent, degree distribution 1.92
dminα dmin for α 357
α+ powerlaw exponent, in-degree distribution 1.737
dminα+ dmin for α+ 146
σ+ standard deviation, in-degree distribution 1,178.173
σ- standard deviation, out-degree distribution 15.571
cv+ coefficient variation, in-degree distribution 21,643.8
cv-
Effective measure!Score: 0.047

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

coefficient variation, out-degree distribution 286.043
σ2+ variance, in-degree distribution 1,388,091.78
σ2- variance, out-degree distribution 242.446
C+d graph centralization 0.931
z- mean out-degree 19.993
$$deg^{--}(G)$$ max partial out-degree 3,541
$$\overline{deg^{--}}(G)$$ mean partial out-degree 1.09
$$deg^-_L(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.099

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max labelled out-degree 30
$$\overline{deg^-_L}(G)$$ mean labelled out-degree 18.34
$$deg^-_D(G)$$ max direct out-degree 3,561
$$\overline{deg^-_D}(G)$$ mean direct out-degree 11.443
z+ mean in-degree 5.444
$$deg^{++}(G)$$ max partial in-degree 103,989
$$\overline{deg^{++}}(G)$$ mean partial in-degree 3.479
$$deg^+_L(G)$$ max labelled in-degree 10
$$\overline{deg^+_L}(G)$$ mean labelled in-degree 1.565
$$deg^+_D(G)$$ max direct in-degree 103,989
$$\overline{deg^+_D}(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.128

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

mean direct in-degree 3.116
$$deg_P(G)$$ max predicate degree 312,324
$$\overline{deg_P}(G)$$ mean predicate degree 55,544.627
$$deg^+_P(G)$$ max predicate in-degree 208,369
$$\overline{deg^+_P}(G)$$ mean predicate in-degree 50,952.773
$$deg^-_P(G)$$ max predicate out-degree 208,680
$$\overline{deg^-_P}(G)$$ mean predicate out-degree 15,966.333
$$\propto_{s-o}(G)$$ subject-object ratio 0.272
$$r_L(G)$$ ratio of repreated predicate lists 0.999
$$deg_{PL}(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.047

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

max predicate list degree 103,989
$$\overline{deg_{PL}}(G)$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.129

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

mean predicate list degree 786.298
$$C_G$$
Effective measure!Score: 0.06

Datasets in this domain can be very well described by means of this particular measure.

distinct classes 8
$$S^C_G$$ all different typed subjects 208,369
$$r_T(G)$$ ratio of typed subjects 1

Plots

Degree distribution shown here
In-degree distribution shown here
Last update of this page: 25 March 2020 13:38:38 CET