PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • Recent debates on informality have challenged the pertinence of the traditional legal-illegal dichotomy for understanding social actions. Located in a grey continuous area, informal practices are based on individuals' perception on the role of the state in a given sector and results from illegal, legal and extra-legal transactions. This paper is an attempt to bring further this debate by proposing a new conceptualization of informality rooted in empirical evidence: we distinguish between informality "in spite" of the state in order to designate practices that overrule state instructions and try to re-regulate areas already regulated by the state; and informality "beyond" the state, defined as a set of practices and informal rules that arrange an area unregulated or deserted by the state. Our theoretical argument is illustrated by two case studies, one devoted to informal child-care in Romania (informality beyond the state) and the other to corruption in Hungary (informality in spite of the state). (xsd:string)
?:citation
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • misc (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 1582-4551 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
?:name
  • Practici informale nocive sau inofensive?: "În pofida" și "dincolo de" stat; cazul Ungariei și României (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:reference
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, XVI, 2016, 2, 219-241 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51763-3 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • XVI (xsd:string)