PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • Secondary analysis of data is seen as a way of maximising the utility of existing research in a non-intrusive way and provides an efficient research strategy at a time of financial constraint. However, there are few examples from the published literature of social science researchers conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data sets. This article reflects on the process of re-using interview transcripts, carried out with young people with a learning disability and their parents on the subject of life choices, held in a United Kingdom qualitative data archive. Secondary analysis of qualitative data, while presenting certain challenges, has much to offer the research community, and is a particularly valuable resource for qualitative research postgraduate students. (author's abstract) (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2015 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2015 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 1438-5627 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 3 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Reflections on the process of conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data concerning informed choice for young people with a disability in transition (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16, 2015, 3, 12 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1503108 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 16 (xsd:string)