Property | Value |
?:citationString
|
-
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2018): CSES Module 4 Full Release. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5182 Data file Version 5.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module4.2018-05-29
(en)
-
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2018): CSES Module 4 Full Release. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA5182 Datenfile Version 5.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module4.2018-05-29
(de)
|
?:comment
|
-
Election Study Notes on Module 4 (ZA5182)
(en)
-
FOR COUNTRY SPECIFIC INFORMATION
see Election Study Notes
(en)
-
VARIABLE NOTES: D3016
Data are available for HONG KONG (2012), LATVIA (2011), MEXICO (2012), MEXICO (2015), PHILIPPINES (2016), POLAND (2011), TAIWAN (2012).
In contexts where left-right is not considered meaningful/important/widely understood, IN ADDITION TO ASKING THE LEFT-RIGHT QUESTION, the collaborator had the option of also administering the optional alternative question which is thought to best summarize the main ideological division in the country. Several respondents mentioned not to know the optional scale in one of the appropriate variables on D3015_ or D3016, but evaluated the other parties on even that scale. These data remain unchanged. For further information, see Variable Notes on D3015_.
(de)
-
VARIABLE NOTES: D3016
Data are available for HONG KONG (2012), LATVIA (2011), MEXICO (2012), MEXICO (2015), PHILIPPINES (2016), POLAND (2011), TAIWAN (2012).
In contexts where left-right is not considered meaningful/important/widely understood, IN ADDITION TO ASKING THE LEFT-RIGHT QUESTION, the collaborator had the option of also administering the optional alternative question which is thought to best summarize the main ideological division in the country. Several respondents mentioned not to know the optional scale in one of the appropriate variables on D3015_ or D3016, but evaluated the other parties on even that scale. These data remain unchanged. For further information, see Variable Notes on D3015_.
(en)
|
?:dateCreated
|
|
?:dateModified
|
|
?:endDate
|
|
?:groupDescription
|
-
CSES is a collaborative program of research among election study teams from around the world. The research program as well as the questionnaire and the study design are developed by an international committee of leading social researchers. Participating countries include a common module of survey questions in their post-election studies. The data contain information on individual choice behavior, demographics, the constituencies, the national election results and the political systems. The studies are then merged into a single, free, public dataset for use in comparative study and cross-level analysis.
(en)
-
Die CSES ist eine weltweite Kooperation von Wahlforschern. Das Forschungsprogramm, der Fragebogen und das Studiendesign werden durch ein internationales Planungskomitee führender Sozialforscher erstellt. Teilnehmende Länder implementieren einen einheitlichen Fragenkomplex in ihre Nachwahlstudien. Die erhoben Daten umfassen das individuelle Wahlverhalten, politische Einstellungen und sozio-demographische Merkmale sowie Angaben zu den Wahlbezirken, den nationalen Wahlergebnissen und dem nationalen politischen System. Die einzelnen Länderstudien werden in einen gemeinsamen Datensatz integriert und stehen der Wissenschaft für vergleichende und länderübergreifende Untersuchungen frei zur Verfügung.
(de)
|
?:hasFulltext
|
|
is
?:hasPart
of
|
|
?:inLanguage
|
-
Englisch
(de)
-
English
(en)
|
?:linksGroup
|
|
?:locationsId
|
-
AR
(xsd:string)
-
AT
(xsd:string)
-
AU
(xsd:string)
-
BG
(xsd:string)
-
BR
(xsd:string)
-
CA
(xsd:string)
-
CH
(xsd:string)
-
CZ
(xsd:string)
-
DE
(xsd:string)
-
FI
(xsd:string)
-
FR
(xsd:string)
-
GB-GBN
(xsd:string)
-
GR
(xsd:string)
-
HK
(xsd:string)
-
IE
(xsd:string)
-
IL
(xsd:string)
-
IS
(xsd:string)
-
JP
(xsd:string)
-
KE
(xsd:string)
-
KR
(xsd:string)
-
LV
(xsd:string)
-
ME
(xsd:string)
-
MX
(xsd:string)
-
NO
(xsd:string)
-
NZ
(xsd:string)
-
PE
(xsd:string)
-
PH
(xsd:string)
-
PL
(xsd:string)
-
PT
(xsd:string)
-
RO
(xsd:string)
-
RS
(xsd:string)
-
SE
(xsd:string)
-
SI
(xsd:string)
-
SK
(xsd:string)
-
TH
(xsd:string)
-
TR
(xsd:string)
-
TW
(xsd:string)
-
US
(xsd:string)
-
ZA
(xsd:string)
|
?:name
|
-
ALTERNATIVE SCALE - SELF
(en)
-
ALTERNATIVE SCALE - SELF
(de)
-
D3016
(xsd:string)
-
D3016 -
(de)
-
D3016 - ALTERNATIVE SCALE - SELF
(en)
|
?:relatedDataset
|
|
?:sourceInfo
|
-
GESIS-ExploreData
(xsd:string)
|
?:spatialCoverage
|
|
?:startDate
|
|
?:studyGroup
|
-
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)
(en)
-
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)
(de)
|
rdf:type
|
|
?:variableInterviewInstructions
|
-
NOTE TO COLLABORATORS: In most national contexts, the left-right dimension will be the single best ideological summary of the current issue conflicts in a society. Where this is known not to be the case a more pertinent dimension of ideological conflict (like the independence-integration dimension in Taiwan) might be used in addition to the left-right placement scales. So where left-right is not considered meaningful/important/widely understood, IN ADDITION TO ASKING THE LEFT-RIGHT QUESTION, the collaborator has the option of also administering a second scale (of 11 points: 0-10) which is thought to best summarize the main ideological division in the country.
(en)
-
NOTE TO COLLABORATORS: In most national contexts, the left-right dimension will be the single best ideological summary of the current issue conflicts in a society. Where this is known not to be the case a more pertinent dimension of ideological conflict (like the independence-integration dimension in Taiwan) might be used in addition to the left-right placement scales. So where left-right is not considered meaningful/important/widely understood, IN ADDITION TO ASKING THE LEFT-RIGHT QUESTION, the collaborator has the option of also administering a second scale (of 11 points: 0-10) which is thought to best summarize the main ideological division in the country.
(de)
|
?:variableLabel
|
-
ALTERNATIVE SCALE - SELF
(de)
-
ALTERNATIVE SCALE - SELF
(en)
|
?:variableName
|
|