PropertyValue
?:citationString
  • The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2018): CSES Module 4 Full Release. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5182 Data file Version 5.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module4.2018-05-29 (en)
  • The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2018): CSES Module 4 Full Release. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA5182 Datenfile Version 5.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module4.2018-05-29 (de)
?:comment
  • Election Study Notes on Module 4 (ZA5182) (en)
  • FOR COUNTRY SPECIFIC INFORMATION

    see Election Study Notes (en)
  • VARIABLE NOTES: D3015_
    Data are available for HONG KONG (2012), LATVIA (2011), LATVIA (2014), MEXICO (2012), PHILIPPINES (2016) and Taiwan (2012).
    In contexts where left-right is not considered meaningful/important/widely understood, IN ADDITION TO ASKING THE LEFT-RIGHT QUESTION, the collaborator had the option of also administering the optional alternative question which is thought to best summarize the main ideological division in the country. Variable D3015_ include these alternative scales where applicable.
    Parties and their alphabetical classifications for each election study are detailed in Part 3 of the CSES Codebook. For more detailed information on how CSES codes parties/coalitions and leaders, please see Part 3 of the CSES Codebook.
    In some cases, parties were assigned an alphabetical CSES code but data for D3015_ is not available for these parties. These instances are documented in an election study note below the party/leader table of the election study to which this applies in Part 3 of the CSES Codebook.
    D3015_ includes several observations in which all parties are scored equally by respondents. Also, there may be instances in which respondents provide the same answer to all items, e.g. "don't know". These data remain unchanged.
    (en)
  • VARIABLE NOTES: D3015_
    Data are available for HONG KONG (2012), LATVIA (2011), LATVIA (2014), MEXICO (2012), PHILIPPINES (2016) and Taiwan (2012).
    In contexts where left-right is not considered meaningful/important/widely understood, IN ADDITION TO ASKING THE LEFT-RIGHT QUESTION, the collaborator had the option of also administering the optional alternative question which is thought to best summarize the main ideological division in the country. Variable D3015_ include these alternative scales where applicable.
    Parties and their alphabetical classifications for each election study are detailed in Part 3 of the CSES Codebook. For more detailed information on how CSES codes parties/coalitions and leaders, please see Part 3 of the CSES Codebook.
    In some cases, parties were assigned an alphabetical CSES code but data for D3015_ is not available for these parties. These instances are documented in an election study note below the party/leader table of the election study to which this applies in Part 3 of the CSES Codebook.
    D3015_ includes several observations in which all parties are scored equally by respondents. Also, there may be instances in which respondents provide the same answer to all items, e.g. "don't know". These data remain unchanged.
    (de)
?:dateCreated
  • 2018 (xsd:gyear)
?:dateModified
  • 2011-01-01 (xsd:date)
?:endDate
  • 2011 (xsd:gyear)
?:groupDescription
  • CSES is a collaborative program of research among election study teams from around the world. The research program as well as the questionnaire and the study design are developed by an international committee of leading social researchers. Participating countries include a common module of survey questions in their post-election studies. The data contain information on individual choice behavior, demographics, the constituencies, the national election results and the political systems. The studies are then merged into a single, free, public dataset for use in comparative study and cross-level analysis. (en)
  • Die CSES ist eine weltweite Kooperation von Wahlforschern. Das Forschungsprogramm, der Fragebogen und das Studiendesign werden durch ein internationales Planungskomitee führender Sozialforscher erstellt. Teilnehmende Länder implementieren einen einheitlichen Fragenkomplex in ihre Nachwahlstudien. Die erhoben Daten umfassen das individuelle Wahlverhalten, politische Einstellungen und sozio-demographische Merkmale sowie Angaben zu den Wahlbezirken, den nationalen Wahlergebnissen und dem nationalen politischen System. Die einzelnen Länderstudien werden in einen gemeinsamen Datensatz integriert und stehen der Wissenschaft für vergleichende und länderübergreifende Untersuchungen frei zur Verfügung. (de)
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • Englisch (de)
  • English (en)
?:linksGroup
?:locationsId
  • AR (xsd:string)
  • AT (xsd:string)
  • AU (xsd:string)
  • BG (xsd:string)
  • BR (xsd:string)
  • CA (xsd:string)
  • CH (xsd:string)
  • CZ (xsd:string)
  • DE (xsd:string)
  • FI (xsd:string)
  • FR (xsd:string)
  • GB-GBN (xsd:string)
  • GR (xsd:string)
  • HK (xsd:string)
  • IE (xsd:string)
  • IL (xsd:string)
  • IS (xsd:string)
  • JP (xsd:string)
  • KE (xsd:string)
  • KR (xsd:string)
  • LV (xsd:string)
  • ME (xsd:string)
  • MX (xsd:string)
  • NO (xsd:string)
  • NZ (xsd:string)
  • PE (xsd:string)
  • PH (xsd:string)
  • PL (xsd:string)
  • PT (xsd:string)
  • RO (xsd:string)
  • RS (xsd:string)
  • SE (xsd:string)
  • SI (xsd:string)
  • SK (xsd:string)
  • TH (xsd:string)
  • TR (xsd:string)
  • TW (xsd:string)
  • US (xsd:string)
  • ZA (xsd:string)
?:name
  • ALTERNATIVE SCALE - PARTY E (de)
  • ALTERNATIVE SCALE - PARTY E (en)
  • D3015_E (xsd:string)
  • D3015_E - (de)
  • D3015_E - ALTERNATIVE SCALE - PARTY E (en)
?:relatedDataset
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-ExploreData (xsd:string)
?:spatialCoverage
?:startDate
  • 2011 (xsd:gyear)
?:studyGroup
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) (en)
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) (de)
rdf:type
?:variableInterviewInstructions
  • NOTE TO COLLABORATORS: In most national contexts, the left-right dimension will be the single best ideological summary of the current issue conflicts in a society. Where this is known not to be the case, a more pertinent dimension of ideological conflict (like the independence-integration dimension in Taiwan) might be used in addition to the left-right placement scales. So where left-right is not considered meaningful/important/widely understood, IN ADDITION TO ASKING THE LEFT-RIGHT QUESTION, the collaborator has the option of also administering a second scale (of 11 points: 0-10) which is thought to best summarize the main ideological division in the country. The parties evaluated in this question set should be the same parties as were asked about in question set Q9a-Q9i.
    (en)
  • NOTE TO COLLABORATORS: In most national contexts, the left-right dimension will be the single best ideological summary of the current issue conflicts in a society. Where this is known not to be the case, a more pertinent dimension of ideological conflict (like the independence-integration dimension in Taiwan) might be used in addition to the left-right placement scales. So where left-right is not considered meaningful/important/widely understood, IN ADDITION TO ASKING THE LEFT-RIGHT QUESTION, the collaborator has the option of also administering a second scale (of 11 points: 0-10) which is thought to best summarize the main ideological division in the country. The parties evaluated in this question set should be the same parties as were asked about in question set Q9a-Q9i.
    (de)
?:variableLabel
  • ALTERNATIVE SCALE - PARTY E (de)
  • ALTERNATIVE SCALE - PARTY E (en)
?:variableName
  • D3015_E (xsd:string)