Property | Value |
?:citationString
|
-
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2018): CSES Module 4 Full Release. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5182 Data file Version 5.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module4.2018-05-29
(en)
-
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2018): CSES Module 4 Full Release. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA5182 Datenfile Version 5.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module4.2018-05-29
(de)
|
?:comment
|
-
Codebook Files for Module 4 (ZA5182)
(en)
-
Election Study Notes on Module 4 (ZA5182)
(en)
-
PARTY | _A | _B | _C | _D | _E | _F | _G | _H | _I | SELF | BRAZIL (2014) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | BULGARIA (2014) | 8 | 0 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 0 | 3 | CZECH REPUBLIC (2013) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | FINLAND (2015) | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | GREECE (2012) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | JAPAN (2013) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 2 | LATVIA (2014) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | MEXICO (2012) | 26 | 26 | 26 | 30 | 31 | 30 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 10 | MEXICO (2015) | 25 | 32 | 23 | 18 | 20 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 9 | MONTENEGRO (2012) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | PHILIPPINES (2016) | 7 | 19 | 0 | 23 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 5 | POLAND (2011) | 65 | 63 | 151 | 93 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | ROMANIA (2012) | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ROMANIA (2014) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | SERBIA (2012) | 16 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 20 | 23 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 64 | SLOVAKIA (2016) | 10 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 13 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 7 | SOUTH AFRICA (2014) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 110 | SWEDEN (2014) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | THAILAND (2011) | 12 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 13 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 24 | 0 |
(en)
-
Please note: Have not heard of left/right response might not have been elicited to this specific question but rather at some point during the entire interview of a respondent.
(en)
-
VARIABLE NOTES: D3013_ Parties and their alphabetical classifications for each election study are detailed in Part 3 of the CSES codebook. For more detailed information on how CSES codes parties/coalitions and leaders, please see Part 3 of the CSES codebook.
In some cases, parties were assigned an alphabetical CSES code but data for D3013_ is not available for these parties. These instances are documented in an election study note below the party/leader table of the Election Study to which this applies in Part 3 of the CSES Codebook.
Note that the CSES asks collaborators to ask the left-right scale questions even if left-right is not considered to be meaningful/important/widely understood in the area being studied. However, it was possible to add an optional alternative scale question. See D3015 and D3016.
Users should note that D3013_ includes several observations in which all parties are scored equally by respondents. Also, there may be instances in which respondents provide the same answer to all items, e.g. "don't know". These data remain unchanged.
Data are unavailable for TAIWAN (2012).
Several respondents mentioned not to know the left-right scale in one of the appropriate variables on D3013_ or D3014, but evaluated the other parties on even that scale. These data remain unchanged.
TABLE: FREQUENCIES OF RESPONDENTS REPORTING THAT THEY DID NOT KNOW OF THE LEFT-RIGHT SCALE BUT PROVIDE AN EVALUATION OF A PARTY ON THE LEFT-RIGHT SCALE
(en)
-
see Codebook Part 3 (Parties and Leaders) or Codebook Part 4 (Primary Electoral Districts)
(en)
-
FOR COUNTRY SPECIFIC INFORMATION
see Election Study Notes
(en)
|
?:dateCreated
|
|
?:dateModified
|
|
?:endDate
|
|
?:groupDescription
|
-
CSES is a collaborative program of research among election study teams from around the world. The research program as well as the questionnaire and the study design are developed by an international committee of leading social researchers. Participating countries include a common module of survey questions in their post-election studies. The data contain information on individual choice behavior, demographics, the constituencies, the national election results and the political systems. The studies are then merged into a single, free, public dataset for use in comparative study and cross-level analysis.
(en)
-
Die CSES ist eine weltweite Kooperation von Wahlforschern. Das Forschungsprogramm, der Fragebogen und das Studiendesign werden durch ein internationales Planungskomitee führender Sozialforscher erstellt. Teilnehmende Länder implementieren einen einheitlichen Fragenkomplex in ihre Nachwahlstudien. Die erhoben Daten umfassen das individuelle Wahlverhalten, politische Einstellungen und sozio-demographische Merkmale sowie Angaben zu den Wahlbezirken, den nationalen Wahlergebnissen und dem nationalen politischen System. Die einzelnen Länderstudien werden in einen gemeinsamen Datensatz integriert und stehen der Wissenschaft für vergleichende und länderübergreifende Untersuchungen frei zur Verfügung.
(de)
|
?:hasFulltext
|
|
is
?:hasPart
of
|
|
?:inLanguage
|
-
Englisch
(de)
-
English
(en)
|
?:linksGroup
|
|
?:locationsId
|
-
AR
(xsd:string)
-
AT
(xsd:string)
-
AU
(xsd:string)
-
BG
(xsd:string)
-
BR
(xsd:string)
-
CA
(xsd:string)
-
CH
(xsd:string)
-
CZ
(xsd:string)
-
DE
(xsd:string)
-
FI
(xsd:string)
-
FR
(xsd:string)
-
GB-GBN
(xsd:string)
-
GR
(xsd:string)
-
HK
(xsd:string)
-
IE
(xsd:string)
-
IL
(xsd:string)
-
IS
(xsd:string)
-
JP
(xsd:string)
-
KE
(xsd:string)
-
KR
(xsd:string)
-
LV
(xsd:string)
-
ME
(xsd:string)
-
MX
(xsd:string)
-
NO
(xsd:string)
-
NZ
(xsd:string)
-
PE
(xsd:string)
-
PH
(xsd:string)
-
PL
(xsd:string)
-
PT
(xsd:string)
-
RO
(xsd:string)
-
RS
(xsd:string)
-
SE
(xsd:string)
-
SI
(xsd:string)
-
SK
(xsd:string)
-
TH
(xsd:string)
-
TR
(xsd:string)
-
TW
(xsd:string)
-
US
(xsd:string)
-
ZA
(xsd:string)
|
?:name
|
-
D3013_I
(xsd:string)
-
D3013_I -
(de)
-
D3013_I - LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - PARTY I
(en)
-
LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - PARTY I
(de)
-
LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - PARTY I
(en)
|
?:relatedDataset
|
|
?:sourceInfo
|
-
GESIS-ExploreData
(xsd:string)
|
?:spatialCoverage
|
|
?:startDate
|
|
?:studyGroup
|
-
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)
(de)
-
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)
(en)
|
rdf:type
|
|
?:variableInterviewInstructions
|
-
NOTE TO COLLABORATORS: The parties evaluated in this question set should be the same parties as were asked about in question set Q9a-Q9i. Collaborators should ask the left-right scale questions, even if left-right is not considered to be meaningful/important/widely understood in the area being studied. If the national collaborator team feels that administering this question set will cause important or serious issues with respect to the conduct of the survey, they should discuss these issues with the CSES Secretariat in advance. Also, a showcard is available for this question.
(en)
-
NOTE TO COLLABORATORS: The parties evaluated in this question set should be the same parties as were asked about in question set Q9a-Q9i. Collaborators should ask the left-right scale questions, even if left-right is not considered to be meaningful/important/widely understood in the area being studied. If the national collaborator team feels that administering this question set will cause important or serious issues with respect to the conduct of the survey, they should discuss these issues with the CSES Secretariat in advance. Also, a showcard is available for this question.
(de)
|
?:variableLabel
|
-
LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - PARTY I
(de)
-
LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - PARTY I
(en)
|
?:variableName
|
|