Property | Value |
?:citationString
|
-
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2015): CSES Module 3 Full Release. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5181 Data file Version 5.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15
(en)
-
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2015): CSES Module 3 Full Release. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA5181 Datenfile Version 5.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15
(de)
|
?:comment
|
-
Election Study Notes on Module 3 (ZA5181)
(en)
-
Appendices I and II on Module 3 (ZA5181)
(en)
-
FOR COUNTRY SPECIFIC INFORMATION
see Election Study Notes
(en)
-
POLITY NAME (ELEC YEAR) | YES | NO | AUSTRALIA (2007) | | X | AUSTRIA (2008) | | X | BELARUS (2008) | X | | BRAZIL (2006) | X | | BRAZIL (2010) | X | | CANADA (2008) | - | - | CHILE (2009) | - | - | CROATIA (2007) | X | | CZECH REPUBLIC (2006) | X | | CZECH REPUBLIC (2010) | X | | DENMARK (2007) | | X | ESTONIA (2011) | X | | FINLAND (2007) | | X | FINLAND (2011) | X | | FRANCE (2007) | | X | GERMANY (2005) | | X | GERMANY (2009) | X | | GREECE (2009) | X | | HONG KONG (2008) | X | | ICELAND (2007) | X | | ICELAND (2009) | X | | IRELAND (2007) | X | | ISRAEL (2006) | X | | JAPAN (2007) | | X | LATVIA (2010) | X | | MEXICO (2006) | X | | MEXICO (2009) | X | | NETHERLANDS (2006) | | X | NETHERLANDS (2010) | X | | NEW ZEALAND (2008) | | X | NORWAY (2005) | | X | NORWAY (2009) | | X | PERU (2011) | | X | PHILIPPINES (2010) | | X | POLAND (2005) | | X | POLAND (2007) | | X | PORTUGAL (2009) | X | | ROMANIA (2009) | X | | SLOVAKIA (2010) | X | | SLOVENIA (2008) | | X | SOUTH AFRICA (2009) | | X | SOUTH KOREA (2008) | - | - | SPAIN (2008) | | X | SWEDEN (2006) | | X | SWITZERLAND (2007) | | X | TAIWAN (2008) | - | - | THAILAND (2007) | | X | TURKEY (2011) | X | | UNITED STATES (2008) | X | | URUGUAY (2009) | | X |
(en)
-
Additionally, when asked about one party at a time, a minority of respondents end up mentioning many more parties than usual. To avoid adding many columns with extremely sparse data, we have included up to 9 variables for C3028_LH with the intention to secure registering, if applicable, responses that refer to parties A through I. Moreover, whenever a respondent mentioned more than 9 parties we included only those responses that refer to parties A to I. With this coding rule, we are only dropping the responses from two survey respondents (each from Finland and Sweden).
The coding on C3028_ depends on C3027_. Respondents that mentioned not having considered to vote for someone else (C3027 is code 5) are excluded from C3028_.
See also variable note on C3027_PR-C3027_UH.
(en)
-
NOTES: C3028_ Data are not available for CANADA (2008), CHILE (2009), SOUTH KOREA (2008), TAIWAN (2008).
In the original questionnaire these questions were intended to capture spontaneous answers, with the respondent mentioning a set of parties, and the recorded values indicating the order of response. However, some studies have been asking these questions with a predetermined list of political parties, and asking about one party at a time. By asking these questions in this way, the order of the responses is lost.
Table: Summary of Availability of Preference Order.
(en)
-
see Appendix I (Parties and Leaders) or Appendix II (Primary Electoral Districts)
(en)
|
?:dateCreated
|
|
?:dateModified
|
|
?:endDate
|
|
?:groupDescription
|
-
CSES is a collaborative program of research among election study teams from around the world. The research program as well as the questionnaire and the study design are developed by an international committee of leading social researchers. Participating countries include a common module of survey questions in their post-election studies. The data contain information on individual choice behavior, demographics, the constituencies, the national election results and the political systems. The studies are then merged into a single, free, public dataset for use in comparative study and cross-level analysis.
(en)
-
Die CSES ist eine weltweite Kooperation von Wahlforschern. Das Forschungsprogramm, der Fragebogen und das Studiendesign werden durch ein internationales Planungskomitee führender Sozialforscher erstellt. Teilnehmende Länder implementieren einen einheitlichen Fragenkomplex in ihre Nachwahlstudien. Die erhoben Daten umfassen das individuelle Wahlverhalten, politische Einstellungen und sozio-demographische Merkmale sowie Angaben zu den Wahlbezirken, den nationalen Wahlergebnissen und dem nationalen politischen System. Die einzelnen Länderstudien werden in einen gemeinsamen Datensatz integriert und stehen der Wissenschaft für vergleichende und länderübergreifende Untersuchungen frei zur Verfügung.
(de)
|
?:hasFulltext
|
|
is
?:hasPart
of
|
|
?:inLanguage
|
-
Englisch
(de)
-
English
(en)
|
?:linksGroup
|
|
?:locationsId
|
-
AT
(xsd:string)
-
AU
(xsd:string)
-
BR
(xsd:string)
-
BY
(xsd:string)
-
CA
(xsd:string)
-
CH
(xsd:string)
-
CL
(xsd:string)
-
CZ
(xsd:string)
-
DE
(xsd:string)
-
DK
(xsd:string)
-
EE
(xsd:string)
-
ES
(xsd:string)
-
FI
(xsd:string)
-
FR
(xsd:string)
-
GR
(xsd:string)
-
HK
(xsd:string)
-
HR
(xsd:string)
-
IE
(xsd:string)
-
IL
(xsd:string)
-
IS
(xsd:string)
-
JP
(xsd:string)
-
KR
(xsd:string)
-
LV
(xsd:string)
-
MX
(xsd:string)
-
NL
(xsd:string)
-
NO
(xsd:string)
-
NZ
(xsd:string)
-
PE
(xsd:string)
-
PH
(xsd:string)
-
PL
(xsd:string)
-
PT
(xsd:string)
-
RO
(xsd:string)
-
SE
(xsd:string)
-
SI
(xsd:string)
-
SK
(xsd:string)
-
TH
(xsd:string)
-
TR
(xsd:string)
-
TW
(xsd:string)
-
US
(xsd:string)
-
UY
(xsd:string)
-
ZA
(xsd:string)
|
?:name
|
-
C3028_LH_1
(xsd:string)
-
C3028_LH_1 -
(de)
-
C3028_LH_1 - R DID CONSIDER VOTING FOR OTHERS-FIRST MENTION, LOWER HOUSE
(en)
-
R DID CONSIDER VOTING FOR OTHERS-FIRST MENTION, LOWER HOUSE
(en)
-
R DID CONSIDER VOTING FOR OTHERS-FIRST MENTION, LOWER HOUSE
(de)
|
?:relatedDataset
|
|
?:sourceInfo
|
-
GESIS-ExploreData
(xsd:string)
|
?:spatialCoverage
|
|
?:startDate
|
|
?:studyGroup
|
-
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)
(en)
-
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)
(de)
|
rdf:type
|
|
?:variableInterviewInstructions
|
-
INTRODUCTION TO QUESTION: Multiple answers are allowed for this question. In studies of parliamentary elections, the respondent should list parties. In studies of presidential elections the respondent should list candidates. Please allow the respondent to select multiple parties/candidates, and please record the parties/candidates in the order they are mentioned by the respondent. In the case of simultaneous elections (for instance, both presidential and parliamentary), please repeat question series Q23a-Q23d for each.
In the case of simultaneous elections (for instance, both presidential and parliamentary [Lower and/or Upper house contest), question Q22b was repeated for each relevant election. See Election Study Notes for more information.
(en)
-
INTRODUCTION TO QUESTION: Multiple answers are allowed for this question. In studies of parliamentary elections, the respondent should list parties. In studies of presidential elections the respondent should list candidates. Please allow the respondent to select multiple parties/candidates, and please record the parties/candidates in the order they are mentioned by the respondent. In the case of simultaneous elections (for instance, both presidential and parliamentary), please repeat question series Q23a-Q23d for each.
In the case of simultaneous elections (for instance, both presidential and parliamentary [Lower and/or Upper house contest), question Q22b was repeated for each relevant election. See Election Study Notes for more information.
(de)
|
?:variableLabel
|
-
R DID CONSIDER VOTING FOR OTHERS-FIRST MENTION, LOWER HOUSE
(en)
-
R DID CONSIDER VOTING FOR OTHERS-FIRST MENTION, LOWER HOUSE
(de)
|
?:variableName
|
|