Property | Value |
?:citationString
|
-
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2015): CSES Module 3 Full Release. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5181 Data file Version 5.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15
(en)
-
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2015): CSES Module 3 Full Release. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA5181 Datenfile Version 5.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15
(de)
|
?:comment
|
-
Election Study Notes on Module 3 (ZA5181)
(en)
-
FOR COUNTRY SPECIFIC INFORMATION
see Election Study Notes
(en)
-
POLITY NAME (ELEC YEAR) | | CHILE (2009) | 12 | ESTONIA (2011) | 5 | MEXICO (2006) | 17 | MEXICO (2009) | 29 | PHILIPPINES (2010) | 40 | TAIWAN (2008) | 180 |
(en)
-
NOTES: C3015 Note that an optional scale to evaluate leaders was only asked in some elections studies. Data are available for CHILE (2009), ESTONIA (2011), MEXICO (2006), MEXICO (2009), PHILIPPINES (2010), TAIWAN (2008).
Researchers should note that C3015 includes several observations in which respondents scored all party leaders equally. These data remain unchanged.
Table: Frequencies on C3015_ for respondents who scored all party leaders equally.
(en)
-
Several respondents mentioned not to know a certain party in C3010_ or C3012_ but evaluated them in C3015_. These data remain unchanged. See Variable Notes on C3010.
Likewise, some respondents mentioned that they have never heard about the corresponding optional scale, but evaluated parties on it. These data remain unchanged. See Variable Notes on C3016.
(en)
|
?:dateCreated
|
|
?:dateModified
|
|
?:endDate
|
|
?:groupDescription
|
-
CSES is a collaborative program of research among election study teams from around the world. The research program as well as the questionnaire and the study design are developed by an international committee of leading social researchers. Participating countries include a common module of survey questions in their post-election studies. The data contain information on individual choice behavior, demographics, the constituencies, the national election results and the political systems. The studies are then merged into a single, free, public dataset for use in comparative study and cross-level analysis.
(en)
-
Die CSES ist eine weltweite Kooperation von Wahlforschern. Das Forschungsprogramm, der Fragebogen und das Studiendesign werden durch ein internationales Planungskomitee führender Sozialforscher erstellt. Teilnehmende Länder implementieren einen einheitlichen Fragenkomplex in ihre Nachwahlstudien. Die erhoben Daten umfassen das individuelle Wahlverhalten, politische Einstellungen und sozio-demographische Merkmale sowie Angaben zu den Wahlbezirken, den nationalen Wahlergebnissen und dem nationalen politischen System. Die einzelnen Länderstudien werden in einen gemeinsamen Datensatz integriert und stehen der Wissenschaft für vergleichende und länderübergreifende Untersuchungen frei zur Verfügung.
(de)
|
?:hasFulltext
|
|
is
?:hasPart
of
|
|
?:inLanguage
|
-
Englisch
(de)
-
English
(en)
|
?:linksGroup
|
|
?:locationsId
|
-
AT
(xsd:string)
-
AU
(xsd:string)
-
BR
(xsd:string)
-
BY
(xsd:string)
-
CA
(xsd:string)
-
CH
(xsd:string)
-
CL
(xsd:string)
-
CZ
(xsd:string)
-
DE
(xsd:string)
-
DK
(xsd:string)
-
EE
(xsd:string)
-
ES
(xsd:string)
-
FI
(xsd:string)
-
FR
(xsd:string)
-
GR
(xsd:string)
-
HK
(xsd:string)
-
HR
(xsd:string)
-
IE
(xsd:string)
-
IL
(xsd:string)
-
IS
(xsd:string)
-
JP
(xsd:string)
-
KR
(xsd:string)
-
LV
(xsd:string)
-
MX
(xsd:string)
-
NL
(xsd:string)
-
NO
(xsd:string)
-
NZ
(xsd:string)
-
PE
(xsd:string)
-
PH
(xsd:string)
-
PL
(xsd:string)
-
PT
(xsd:string)
-
RO
(xsd:string)
-
SE
(xsd:string)
-
SI
(xsd:string)
-
SK
(xsd:string)
-
TH
(xsd:string)
-
TR
(xsd:string)
-
TW
(xsd:string)
-
US
(xsd:string)
-
UY
(xsd:string)
-
ZA
(xsd:string)
|
?:name
|
-
C3015_F
(xsd:string)
-
C3015_F -
(de)
-
C3015_F - OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER F
(en)
-
OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER F
(en)
-
OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER F
(de)
|
?:relatedDataset
|
|
?:sourceInfo
|
-
GESIS-ExploreData
(xsd:string)
|
?:spatialCoverage
|
|
?:startDate
|
|
?:studyGroup
|
-
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)
(de)
-
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)
(en)
|
rdf:type
|
|
?:variableInterviewInstructions
|
-
INTRODUCTION TO QUESTION: In most national contexts, the left-right dimension will be the single best ideological summary of the current issue conflicts in a society. Where this is known not to be the case, a more pertinent dimension of ideological conflict (like the independence-integration dimension in Taiwan) might be used in addition to the left-right placement scales. So where left-right is not considered meaningful/important/widely understood, IN ADDITION TO ASKING THE LEFT-RIGHT QUESTION, the collaborator has the option of also administering a second scale (of 11 points: 0-10) which is thought to best summarize the main ideological division in the country. This question set (about leaders) should be asked ONLY in studies of presidential elections. Candidates/leaders to be evaluated should be the leaders of the parties rated in question set Q9a-Q9i.
(de)
-
INTRODUCTION TO QUESTION: In most national contexts, the left-right dimension will be the single best ideological summary of the current issue conflicts in a society. Where this is known not to be the case, a more pertinent dimension of ideological conflict (like the independence-integration dimension in Taiwan) might be used in addition to the left-right placement scales. So where left-right is not considered meaningful/important/widely understood, IN ADDITION TO ASKING THE LEFT-RIGHT QUESTION, the collaborator has the option of also administering a second scale (of 11 points: 0-10) which is thought to best summarize the main ideological division in the country. This question set (about leaders) should be asked ONLY in studies of presidential elections. Candidates/leaders to be evaluated should be the leaders of the parties rated in question set Q9a-Q9i.
(en)
|
?:variableLabel
|
-
OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER F
(de)
-
OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER F
(en)
|
?:variableName
|
|