|
?:comment
|
-
Election Study Notes on Module 3 (ZA5181)
(en)
-
FOR COUNTRY SPECIFIC INFORMATION
see Election Study Notes
(en)
-
POLITY NAME (ELEC YEAR) |
|
AUSTRALIA (2007) |
54 |
CZECH REPUBLIC (2006) |
40 |
CZECH REPUBLIC (2010) |
45 |
GERMANY (2005) |
205 |
IRELAND (2007) |
444 |
NEW ZEALAND (2008) |
191 |
ROMANIA (2009) |
8 |
SPAIN (2008) |
209 |
THAILAND (2007) |
61 |
(en)
-
NOTES: C2018
Data are not available for AUSTRIA (2008), BRAZIL (2006), CANADA (2008), CHILE (2009), DENMARK (2007), FINLAND (2007), FINLAND (2011), ICELAND (2007), ICELAND (2009), NETHERLANDS (2006), NETHERLANDS (2010), PERU (2011), POLAND (2005), POLAND (2007), SLOVAKIA (2010), SLOVENIA (2008), SOUTH AFRICA (2009), SWEDEN (2006), TAIWAN (2008), UNITED STATES (2008).
There is variation in the manner the questions about respondent's spouse were administered in different election studies. In some cases only those categorized as "married or living together" in C2004 were asked the spouse questions, while in some surveys other categories could also get these questions (see Election Study Notes). Moreover that there is some inconsistency among studies in the way the responses to the questions about current employment status of souses (C2015) affected the application of the follow-up occupation variables (C2017-C2019). The CSES standard is that the occupation variables are asked from those in the labor force. However, in some cases, for spouses categorized as not in labor force in C2015 (codes 6-12), the occupation variables may report respondent's last occupation. Hence, the responses concerning occupation that belong to respondents not in labor force presumably reflect their previous or last occupation.
Data on C2018 for respondents out of labor force are available for AUSTRALIA (2007), BELARUS (2008), BRAZIL (2010), CROATIA (2007), CZECH REPUBLIC (2006), CZECH REPUBLIC (2010), FRANCE (2007), GERMANY (2005), GERMANY (2009), IRELAND (2007), ISRAEL (2006), JAPAN (2007), NEW ZEALAND (2008), NORWAY (2005), NORWAY (2009), PORTUGAL (2009), ROMANIA (2009), SOUTH KOREA (2008), SPAIN (2008), SWITZERLAND (2007), THAILAND (2007).
There is variation in the ways in which the questions about respondent's spouse were administered in different election studies. In some cases only those categorized as "married or living together" in C2004 were asked the spouse questions, while in some surveys other responses could also lead to a respondent being asked these questions. Consequently C2018 sometimes includes information of spouses from respondents who reported neither being married nor living together with a partner (C2004 is not code 1.). These data remained unchanged. For further details and explanations see Election Study Notes on C2004.
Table: Frequencies on C2018 for respondents without partner or spouse living in their household:
(de)
-
NOTES: C2018
Data are not available for AUSTRIA (2008), BRAZIL (2006), CANADA (2008), CHILE (2009), DENMARK (2007), FINLAND (2007), FINLAND (2011), ICELAND (2007), ICELAND (2009), NETHERLANDS (2006), NETHERLANDS (2010), PERU (2011), POLAND (2005), POLAND (2007), SLOVAKIA (2010), SLOVENIA (2008), SOUTH AFRICA (2009), SWEDEN (2006), TAIWAN (2008), UNITED STATES (2008).
There is variation in the manner the questions about respondent's spouse were administered in different election studies. In some cases only those categorized as "married or living together" in C2004 were asked the spouse questions, while in some surveys other categories could also get these questions (see Election Study Notes). Moreover that there is some inconsistency among studies in the way the responses to the questions about current employment status of souses (C2015) affected the application of the follow-up occupation variables (C2017-C2019). The CSES standard is that the occupation variables are asked from those in the labor force. However, in some cases, for spouses categorized as not in labor force in C2015 (codes 6-12), the occupation variables may report respondent's last occupation. Hence, the responses concerning occupation that belong to respondents not in labor force presumably reflect their previous or last occupation.
Data on C2018 for respondents out of labor force are available for AUSTRALIA (2007), BELARUS (2008), BRAZIL (2010), CROATIA (2007), CZECH REPUBLIC (2006), CZECH REPUBLIC (2010), FRANCE (2007), GERMANY (2005), GERMANY (2009), IRELAND (2007), ISRAEL (2006), JAPAN (2007), NEW ZEALAND (2008), NORWAY (2005), NORWAY (2009), PORTUGAL (2009), ROMANIA (2009), SOUTH KOREA (2008), SPAIN (2008), SWITZERLAND (2007), THAILAND (2007).
There is variation in the ways in which the questions about respondent's spouse were administered in different election studies. In some cases only those categorized as "married or living together" in C2004 were asked the spouse questions, while in some surveys other responses could also lead to a respondent being asked these questions. Consequently C2018 sometimes includes information of spouses from respondents who reported neither being married nor living together with a partner (C2004 is not code 1.). These data remained unchanged. For further details and explanations see Election Study Notes on C2004.
Table: Frequencies on C2018 for respondents without partner or spouse living in their household:
(en)
|
![[This page as RDF]](https://data.gesis.org/gesiskg/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}