PropertyValue
?:citationString
  • The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2015): CSES Module 2 Full Release. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5180 Data file Version 6.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module2.2015-12-15 (en)
  • The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2015): CSES Module 2 Full Release. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA5180 Datenfile Version 6.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module2.2015-12-15 (de)
?:comment
  • Election Study Notes on Module 2 (ZA5180) (en)
  • Appendices I and II on Module 2 (ZA5180) (en)



  • FOR COUNTRY SPECIFIC INFORMATION

    see Election Study Notes (en)

  • see Appendix I (Parties and Leaders) or Appendix II (Primary Electoral Districts) (en)
  • II. DATA ON ELECTORAL INSTITUTIONS

    If possible, please supplement this section with copies of the electoral law, voters’ handbooks, electoral commission reports, and/or any other relevant materials.

    A. QUESTIONS ABOUT ELECTORAL DISTRICTS.

    In some electoral systems, there are electoral districts that are geographically nested but not otherwise related for purposes of seat allocation. In Lithuania, for example, there are 71 single-member districts that operate under a majority runoff system, and also a single nationwide district that operates under proportional representation (the largest remainders method with the Hare quota). Neither votes nor seats from the single-member districts transfer to the nationwide district, however. The two processes are entirely independent (with voters having one vote in each district). In this case, the nationwide district, although it contains the 71 single-member districts, is not considered to be secondary. It is primary. One might say that there are two segments to the electoral system in such cases.>
    (en)
  • NOTES: B5031
    Also see notes for variable B5030.

    In some systems there are some seats reserved to be allocated in such a way that corrects for discrepancies between the proportion of votes a party receives and their share of the seats in the legislature (i.e., a "corrective tier"). Because the allocation of seats in a corrective tier is not independent of the distribution of votes in a particular segment- in fact, it is this distribution that determines the allocation of seats in the corrective tier- the presence of corrective tiers has no bearing on the number of electoral segments. Only those characteristics of directly elected tiers are reported in these data.
    (en)
  • NOTES: B5031
    Also see notes for variable B5030.

    In some systems there are some seats reserved to be allocated in such a way that corrects for discrepancies between the proportion of votes a party receives and their share of the seats in the legislature (i.e., a "corrective tier"). Because the allocation of seats in a corrective tier is not independent of the distribution of votes in a particular segment- in fact, it is this distribution that determines the allocation of seats in the corrective tier- the presence of corrective tiers has no bearing on the number of electoral segments. Only those characteristics of directly elected tiers are reported in these data.
    (de)
?:dateCreated
  • 2015 (xsd:gyear)
?:dateModified
  • 2001-01-01 (xsd:date)
?:endDate
  • 2001 (xsd:gyear)
?:groupDescription
  • CSES is a collaborative program of research among election study teams from around the world. The research program as well as the questionnaire and the study design are developed by an international committee of leading social researchers. Participating countries include a common module of survey questions in their post-election studies. The data contain information on individual choice behavior, demographics, the constituencies, the national election results and the political systems. The studies are then merged into a single, free, public dataset for use in comparative study and cross-level analysis. (en)
  • Die CSES ist eine weltweite Kooperation von Wahlforschern. Das Forschungsprogramm, der Fragebogen und das Studiendesign werden durch ein internationales Planungskomitee führender Sozialforscher erstellt. Teilnehmende Länder implementieren einen einheitlichen Fragenkomplex in ihre Nachwahlstudien. Die erhoben Daten umfassen das individuelle Wahlverhalten, politische Einstellungen und sozio-demographische Merkmale sowie Angaben zu den Wahlbezirken, den nationalen Wahlergebnissen und dem nationalen politischen System. Die einzelnen Länderstudien werden in einen gemeinsamen Datensatz integriert und stehen der Wissenschaft für vergleichende und länderübergreifende Untersuchungen frei zur Verfügung. (de)
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • Englisch (de)
  • English (en)
?:linksGroup
?:locationsId
  • AL (xsd:string)
  • AU (xsd:string)
  • BE (xsd:string)
  • BG (xsd:string)
  • BR (xsd:string)
  • CA (xsd:string)
  • CH (xsd:string)
  • CL (xsd:string)
  • CZ (xsd:string)
  • DE (xsd:string)
  • DK (xsd:string)
  • ES (xsd:string)
  • FI (xsd:string)
  • FR (xsd:string)
  • GB-GBN (xsd:string)
  • HK (xsd:string)
  • HU (xsd:string)
  • IE (xsd:string)
  • IL (xsd:string)
  • IS (xsd:string)
  • IT (xsd:string)
  • JP (xsd:string)
  • KG (xsd:string)
  • KR (xsd:string)
  • MX (xsd:string)
  • NL (xsd:string)
  • NO (xsd:string)
  • NZ (xsd:string)
  • PE (xsd:string)
  • PH (xsd:string)
  • PL (xsd:string)
  • PT (xsd:string)
  • RO (xsd:string)
  • RU (xsd:string)
  • SE (xsd:string)
  • SI (xsd:string)
  • TW (xsd:string)
  • US (xsd:string)
?:name
  • B5031_1 (xsd:string)
  • B5031_1 - (de)
  • B5031_1 - ELECTORAL SEGMENTS - LOWER HOUSE (en)
  • ELECTORAL SEGMENTS - LOWER HOUSE (de)
  • ELECTORAL SEGMENTS - LOWER HOUSE (en)
?:relatedDataset
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-ExploreData (xsd:string)
?:spatialCoverage
?:startDate
  • 2001 (xsd:gyear)
?:studyGroup
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) (de)
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) (en)
rdf:type
?:variableLabel
  • ELECTORAL SEGMENTS - LOWER HOUSE (de)
  • ELECTORAL SEGMENTS - LOWER HOUSE (en)
?:variableName
  • B5031_1 (xsd:string)