PropertyValue
?:citationString
  • The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2015): CSES Module 2 Full Release. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5180 Data file Version 6.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module2.2015-12-15 (en)
  • The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2015): CSES Module 2 Full Release. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA5180 Datenfile Version 6.0.0, doi:10.7804/cses.module2.2015-12-15 (de)
?:comment
  • Election Study Notes on Module 2 (ZA5180) (en)
  • Appendices I and II on Module 2 (ZA5180) (en)



  • FOR COUNTRY SPECIFIC INFORMATION

    see Election Study Notes (en)

  • see Appendix I (Parties and Leaders) or Appendix II (Primary Electoral Districts) (en)
  • NOTES: B3037
    Not all questionnaires include response category code 96.
    Refer to Appendix I for the names of political parties.
    (en)
  • NOTES: B3037
    Not all questionnaires include response category code 96.
    Refer to Appendix I for the names of political parties.
    (de)
?:dateCreated
  • 2015 (xsd:gyear)
?:dateModified
  • 2001-01-01 (xsd:date)
?:endDate
  • 2001 (xsd:gyear)
?:groupDescription
  • CSES is a collaborative program of research among election study teams from around the world. The research program as well as the questionnaire and the study design are developed by an international committee of leading social researchers. Participating countries include a common module of survey questions in their post-election studies. The data contain information on individual choice behavior, demographics, the constituencies, the national election results and the political systems. The studies are then merged into a single, free, public dataset for use in comparative study and cross-level analysis. (en)
  • Die CSES ist eine weltweite Kooperation von Wahlforschern. Das Forschungsprogramm, der Fragebogen und das Studiendesign werden durch ein internationales Planungskomitee führender Sozialforscher erstellt. Teilnehmende Länder implementieren einen einheitlichen Fragenkomplex in ihre Nachwahlstudien. Die erhoben Daten umfassen das individuelle Wahlverhalten, politische Einstellungen und sozio-demographische Merkmale sowie Angaben zu den Wahlbezirken, den nationalen Wahlergebnissen und dem nationalen politischen System. Die einzelnen Länderstudien werden in einen gemeinsamen Datensatz integriert und stehen der Wissenschaft für vergleichende und länderübergreifende Untersuchungen frei zur Verfügung. (de)
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • Englisch (de)
  • English (en)
?:linksGroup
?:locationsId
  • AL (xsd:string)
  • AU (xsd:string)
  • BE (xsd:string)
  • BG (xsd:string)
  • BR (xsd:string)
  • CA (xsd:string)
  • CH (xsd:string)
  • CL (xsd:string)
  • CZ (xsd:string)
  • DE (xsd:string)
  • DK (xsd:string)
  • ES (xsd:string)
  • FI (xsd:string)
  • FR (xsd:string)
  • GB-GBN (xsd:string)
  • HK (xsd:string)
  • HU (xsd:string)
  • IE (xsd:string)
  • IL (xsd:string)
  • IS (xsd:string)
  • IT (xsd:string)
  • JP (xsd:string)
  • KG (xsd:string)
  • KR (xsd:string)
  • MX (xsd:string)
  • NL (xsd:string)
  • NO (xsd:string)
  • NZ (xsd:string)
  • PE (xsd:string)
  • PH (xsd:string)
  • PL (xsd:string)
  • PT (xsd:string)
  • RO (xsd:string)
  • RU (xsd:string)
  • SE (xsd:string)
  • SI (xsd:string)
  • TW (xsd:string)
  • US (xsd:string)
?:name
  • B3037_E (xsd:string)
  • B3037_E - (de)
  • B3037_E - LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY E (en)
  • LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY E (de)
  • LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY E (en)
?:relatedDataset
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-ExploreData (xsd:string)
?:spatialCoverage
?:startDate
  • 2001 (xsd:gyear)
?:studyGroup
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) (en)
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) (de)
rdf:type
?:variableInterviewInstructions
  • INTRODUCTION TO QUESTION: (1) Where possible, collaborators should ask about all parties represented or likely to be represented in the Parliament (or running in the presidential contest). In circumstances where there are more than six such parties, collaborators should ask at least about the six most relevant parties. In assessing relevance, collaborators should consider likely size and likely importance in coalition formation. If parties only contest elections in part of the country, those parties need only be asked about in those parts of the country where they contest seats. (2) It is important that interviewers properly record the volunteered responses don't know and haven't heard of when respondents offer either response.
    SHOWCARD 3
    (de)
  • INTRODUCTION TO QUESTION: (1) Where possible, collaborators should ask about all parties represented or likely to be represented in the Parliament (or running in the presidential contest). In circumstances where there are more than six such parties, collaborators should ask at least about the six most relevant parties. In assessing relevance, collaborators should consider likely size and likely importance in coalition formation. If parties only contest elections in part of the country, those parties need only be asked about in those parts of the country where they contest seats. (2) It is important that interviewers properly record the volunteered responses don't know and haven't heard of when respondents offer either response.
    SHOWCARD 3
    (en)
?:variableLabel
  • LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY E (en)
  • LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY E (de)
?:variableName
  • B3037_E (xsd:string)