Property | Value |
?:abstract
|
-
Although electoral volatility has become a widely studied topic in political science, prior research neglected the role of between-campaign periods in contributing to inter-election volatility. Depending on the political setting, between-campaign periods set the stage for electoral competition and preform political cognitions and attitudes feeding into voters’ ultimate decision-making, irrespective of level of political involvement. Drawing on a unique data set from an intra- and inter-election panel survey conducted in the 2009 and 2013 German federal elections, the evidence suggests that between-campaign changes in party preferences and political attitudes were at least as important as within-campaign changes in contributing to inter-election switching. Moreover, the role of political involvement in shaping electoral volatility is more limited than suggested by conventional wisdom.
(xsd:string)
|
?:author
|
|
?:comment
|
|
?:dataSource
|
-
GLES-Bibliography
(xsd:string)
|
?:dateCreated
|
-
5. Fassung, März 2016
(xsd:gyear)
|
?:dateModified
|
|
?:datePublished
|
|
?:duplicate
|
|
is
?:hasPart
of
|
|
is
?:mainEntity
of
|
|
?:name
|
-
Vote switching in two consecutive national election campaigns: Evidence from the 2009-to-2013 GLES campaign panel survey
(xsd:string)
|
?:publicationType
|
-
inproceedings
(xsd:string)
|
?:reference
|
|
?:sourceCollection
|
-
9. General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR)
(xsd:string)
|
?:sourceInfo
|
-
Bibsonomy
(xsd:string)
-
In 9. General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR), 2015
(xsd:string)
|
?:startDate
|
-
26.08-29.08.2015
(xsd:gyear)
|
?:studyGroup
|
-
German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES)
(xsd:string)
|
?:tags
|
-
2015
(xsd:string)
-
FDZ_Wahlen
(xsd:string)
-
GLES
(xsd:string)
-
GLES_input2015
(xsd:string)
-
GLES_pro
(xsd:string)
-
GLES_version5
(xsd:string)
-
ZA5305
(xsd:string)
-
ZA5704
(xsd:string)
-
checked
(xsd:string)
-
inproceedings
(xsd:string)
|
rdf:type
|
|