PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • Televised debates are accompanied by extensive media coverage. TV networks start their instant analyses right after the debate. This is continued in the following days, when media coverage is still massive. To what extent the media’s follow-up communication matters for shaping citizens’ perceptions of debates (especially in relation to the event itself) is disputed in the literature. To further add to this literature, we have combined an experimental element with a four-wave panel design in the context of the 2009 German televised debate. 400 citizens followed the debate (live) in the lab; in addition, they were asked to fill out questionnaires four times: Immediately before and after the debate, about a week after the debate and finally after Election Day. The focus of wave 3 was on follow-up communication. In addition to this panel, 50 out of the 400 participants (randomly selected) did not only watch the debate, but also some instant analysis provided by a major network. In this context, journalists, politicians and celebrities were talking about and interpreting the statements and appearances of the candidates in the just seen debate. In addition, first results of an instant poll were presented. That given, we will compare direct debate effects (i.e. the impact of the debate itself) to indirect debate effects (i.e. the impact of media reports) – using perceptions of who won the debate (and their stability) as our major dependent variable. (xsd:string)
?:author
?:comment
  • (GLES) (xsd:string)
?:dataSource
  • GLES-Bibliography (xsd:string)
?:dateCreated
  • 3. Fassung, März 2014 (xsd:gyear)
?:dateModified
  • 2010 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2010 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
is ?:hasPart of
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • It's the Media, Stupid, isn’t it? The Impact of the Media on Viewers’ Perceptions of the 2009 German Televised Debate (xsd:string)
?:publicationType
  • inproceedings (xsd:string)
?:reference
?:sourceCollection
  • 33. Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology (ISPP) (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • Bibsonomy (xsd:string)
  • In 33. Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology (ISPP), 2010 (xsd:string)
?:startDate
  • 07.07.-10.07.2010 (xsd:gyear)
?:studyGroup
  • German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES) (xsd:string)
?:tags
  • 2010 (xsd:string)
  • FDZ_Wahlen (xsd:string)
  • GLES (xsd:string)
  • GLES_input2013 (xsd:string)
  • GLES_pro (xsd:string)
  • GLES_version3 (xsd:string)
  • ZA5309 (xsd:string)
  • ZA5310 (xsd:string)
  • checked (xsd:string)
  • inproceedings (xsd:string)
rdf:type