PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • Climate negotiation outcomes are difficult to evaluate objectively because there are no clear reference scenarios. Subjective assessments from those directly involved in the negotiations are particularly important, as this may influence strategy and future negotiation participation. Here we analyse the perceived success of the climate negotiations in a sample of 656 experts involved in international climate policy. Respondents were pessimistic when asked for specific assessments of the current approach centred on voluntary pledges, but were more optimistic when asked for general assessments of the outcomes and usefulness of the climate negotiations. Individuals who were more involved in the negotiation process tended to be more optimistic, especially in terms of general assessments. Our results indicate that two reinforcing effects are at work: a high degree of involvement changes individuals’ perceptions and more optimistic individuals are more inclined to remain involved in the negotiations. (xsd:string)
?:archivedAt
?:category
  • Development Policy (en)
  • Economics (en)
  • Entwicklungspolitik (de)
  • Foreign Affairs (en)
  • International Politics (en)
  • International Relations (en)
  • Social Psychology (en)
  • Sozialpsychologie (de)
  • Wirtschaftswissenschaften (de)
  • internationale Beziehungen (de)
?:citationString
  • Dannenberg, Astrid (2017): Climate negotiators’ and scientists’ assessments of the climate negotiations. GESIS, Cologne. Data File Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/1478 (en)
  • Dannenberg, Astrid (2017): Climate negotiators’ and scientists’ assessments of the climate negotiations. GESIS, Köln. Datenfile Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/1478 (de)
?:conditionsOfAccess
  • Free access (with registration) (en)
  • Freier Zugang (mit Registrierung) (de)
?:currentVersion
  • 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/1478 (xsd:string)
?:dataCollection
  • Selbstausfüller:CAWI(Computerunterstütztes Web-Interview) (de)
  • Self-administered questionnaire:CAWI(Computer-assisted web interviewing) (en)
?:dateCreated
  • 2017 (xsd:gyear)
?:dateModified
  • 2017-01-01 (xsd:date)
?:datePublished
  • 2017 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.7802/1478 ()
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:license
  • CC BY-NC 4.0: Namensnennung– Nicht kommerziell (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.de) (xsd:string)
?:name
  • Climate negotiators’ and scientists’ assessments of the climate negotiations (xsd:string)
?:principalInvestigator
  • Dannenberg, Astrid (xsd:string)
  • Tavoni, Alessandro;Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AE, UK;Researcher (xsd:string)
  • Zitzelsberger, Sonja;Kassel University;Researcher (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • SowiDataNet|datorium (en)
?:publisher
?:selectionMethod
  • Participants were recruited from the two main institutions that the international community has established to address climate change: the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (en)
  • Participants were recruited from the two main institutions that the international community has established to address climate change: the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (de)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS, Cologne. Data File Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/1478 (en)
  • GESIS, Köln. Datenfile Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/1478 (de)
  • GESIS-SowiDataNet|datorium (xsd:string)
?:studyPublications
  • Climate negotiators’ and scientists’ assessments of the climate negotiations, Nature Climate Change, VOL 7, JUNE 2017 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:variableMeasured
  • a worldwide survey with 656 respondents from more than 130 countries. (xsd:string)