In a previous study, Ebrahim et al. [34] evaluated reanalyses of published RCTs and found that 35% of the reanalyses could alter conclusions from those originally published, were the original authors to have concluded that they were inept in their analysis, further indicating this need for an open access to published study data.
![[This page as RDF]](http://data.gesis.org/somesci/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}