| ?:linkContext | 
            
              DeRue, D. Scott et al. (2011): Trait and Behavioral Theories of Leadership: An Integration and Meta- Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity. In: Personnel Psychology 64,1: 7-52. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x].
                 (xsd:string)
              
            
              DeRue, D. Scott u.a., 2011: Trait and behavioral theories of Leadership: An integration and meta- analytic test of their relativ validity, in: Personnel Psychology, 64, S. 7-52.
                 (xsd:string)
              
            
              DeRue, S. D./Nahrgang, J. D./Wellman, N./Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: an integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. In: Personnel Psychology 64/2011, S. 7-52.
                 (xsd:string)
              
            
              Derue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leader- ship: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7-52.
                 (xsd:string)
              
            
              Derue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integra- tion and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64, 7-52. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x
                 (xsd:string)
              
            
              Derue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., and Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x
                 (xsd:string)
              
             | 
      
        | ?:name | 
            
              Derue, D. S., ., Wellman, N., Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integra- tion and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), pp. 7-52.
                 (xsd:string)
              
             |