PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • Ten years ago, sexual orientation and gender identity were not considered topics that should be worked on as part of EU foreign policy. Today we can say that these issues are institutionalized and formalized as Council Guidelines for the promotion of the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people. This paper addresses the question of how this was possible, given the contested nature of the topic and absence of apparent external shocks that are often cited by institutional literature to explain such radical changes. The analysis of interviews suggests that the interplay between the external political context and internal factors shaped a series of incremental changes, each building on the previous one. It confirms the dynamic nature of institutions and shows how actors, enabled and constrained by institutions, act less strategically than is often assumed. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.3224/dms.v9i1.23639 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 2196-1395 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Contested Issue and Incremental Change: The Example of LGBTI in EU Foreign Policy (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: der moderne staat - dms: Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 9, 2016, 1, 35-50 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-92746-2 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 9 (xsd:string)