PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • Agnostics as well as theists should answer evidential arguments from evil, at least when confronted with them. In this paper, I answer such an argument by appealing to sceptical agnosticism. A sceptical agnostic is not only undecided about the existence of a perfectly good and omnipotent God, but also believes that we cannot make any judgement about whether or not seemingly gratuitous evil probably is gratuitous. I argue that such agnosticism has several advantages compared with sceptical theism. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2023 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2023 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.1163/22105700-bja10026 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 2210-5700 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Sceptical Agnosticism (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, 13, 2023, 1, 31-43 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-92716-7 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 13 (xsd:string)