PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • National identity is widely used to explain anti-immigrant attitudes and thus the appeal for right-wing (populist) parties. Yet, consensus on how to capture national identity is lacking. This article identifies ideal-typical patterns of national boundary making across 42 countries and more than 25 years beyond the ethnic-civic dichotomy and addresses the multidimensionality of national identity. Using latent class analysis and cluster analysis, four ideal-typical conceptions of nationhood are identified and shown to be differently related to national attachment, national pride, and national chauvinism. Overall, the results close the methodological-empirical gap between classical approaches and recent inductive approaches to national identity and demonstrate that national identity is a cross-cultural phenomenon with distinct types. (xsd:string)
?:citation
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2023 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2023 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.1111/nana.12926 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 1469-8129 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • And if they don't dance, they are no friends of mine: Exploring boundaries of national identity (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:reference
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Nations and Nationalism, 29, 2023, 2, 579-597 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-85323-7 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 29 (xsd:string)