PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • National identities are often conceived of as factors that lend structure and stability to citizens’ political opinions on issues such as immigration. While citizens who define national membership in ethno-cultural terms are less likely to support immigration, those with a civic conception are more likely to do so. The authors propose that defining national identity along both ethno-cultural and civic lines may give rise to conflicting considerations, leading people to experience ambivalence, implying that national identities may serve less as a stabilizing force than suggested by previous research. Findings from heterogeneous choice models and a unique survey experiment show that German citizens with mixed conceptions of national identity had more variable and more malleable opinions than individuals with ideal-type conceptions during the 2015/2016 European refugee crisis. The findings point to an identity-based source of ambivalence and extend current understandings of how people form attitudes towards immigration. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2021 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2021 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.1017/S0007123418000522 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 1469-2112 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Conceptions of National Identity and Ambivalence towards Immigration (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:reference
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: British Journal of Political Science, 51, 2021, 1, 93-114 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-77665-5 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 51 (xsd:string)