PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • The practice of digital self-tracking of health data addresses inter-related contingencies on the micro and macro level: on the micro level, digital self-tracking can be perceived as facilitation of lifeworld contingencies and the expression of the way contingency is dealt with in (socially) exhausted societies. Together, these can be understood as a strategy of the "privatization of contingency." The attempt to reduce the individual’s contingency of action is accompanied by the increase of lifeworld contingency, resulting in a contingency dilemma in contemporary self-tracking which produces (new) dependencies and vulnerabilities with respect to the technology used. Through a multilevel analysis of digital self-tracking and an empirical study on vulnerable self-trackers, a number of those pathological effects of the contingency dilemma are examined using methods from pragmatism and theory of conventions, while highlighting a possible solution to this dilemma. (xsd:string)
is ?:citation of
?:citation
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2021 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2021 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.12759/hsr.46.2021.1.206-229 ()
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 0172-6404 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Adjusting Reality: The Contingency Dilemma in the Context of Popularised Practices of Digital Self-Tracking of Health Data (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:reference
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Historical Social Research, 46, 2021, 1, 206-229 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:volumeNumber
  • 46 (xsd:string)