PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • The paper is dvoted to interdisciplinary research at the intersection of symbolic logic, mathematical ethics, and philosophical theology. By comparing definitions of relevant functions, a surprising analogy is discovered between the well-known Philo’s precise definition of implication in logic (classical one) and Augustine’s precise definition of God’s morally good reaction to human actions. The moral-value-table-representation of Augustinian doctrine is compared with moral-value-table-representations of Pelagius’ and Leo Tolstoy’s views of adequate moral-response-actions. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2020 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2020 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.30878/ces.v27n3a4 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 2395-8782 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 3 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • A wonderful analogy between Augustine's definition of moral-valuefunctional sense of response-action and Philo's definition of truth-functional sense of implication in logic (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: CIENCIA ergo-sum : revista científica multidisciplinaria de la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, 27, 2020, 3, 351-363 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-71211-4 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 27 (xsd:string)