PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • Do we owe it to future generations, as a requirement of justice, to take action to mitigate anthropogenic climate change? This paper examines the implications of Derek Parfit's notorious non-identity problem for that question. An argument from Jörg Tremmel that the non-identity effect of climate policy is "insignificant" is examined and found wanting, and a contrastive, difference-making approach for comparing different choices' non-identity effects is developed. Using the approach, it is argued that the non-identity effect of a given policy response to climate change depends on the contrasting policy. Compared to a baseline scenario without further mitigation, the non-identity effect of choosing to limit climate change to 1.5°C would be highly significant. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2019 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2019 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.24357/igjr.5.2.788 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 2190-6335 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Climate change, intergenerational justice, and the non-identity effect (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Intergenerational Justice Review, 5, 2019, 2, 56-62 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-66496-4 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 5 (xsd:string)