PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • This article discusses the use of scientific facts as argument for a 1999 Brazilian debate about the legitimacy of an official aids prevention policy. It seeks to defamiliarized a common Aids argumentative practice which uses a classification of a scientific public health measure as a main legitimacy judgment. It is argued that it is peoples' negotiations and objects' mobilization that gives legitimacy to the implementation of a prevention strategy - according to a Social Psychology of science with a constructionist point of view. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2003 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2003 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • pt (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issueNumber
  • 4 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Dados científicos como argumento: o caso da redução de parceiros sexuais na prevenção ao HIV no Brasil (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:reference
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Athenea Digital: Revista de Pensamiento e Investigacion Social, 2003, 4, 26-41 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-64704 ()