PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • The following is not a prescriptive text, neither a definitive one, though sometimes it might be thought it is the other way around. In any case, this is a reflection or, if you dislike Cartesian terminology, this is a way of arguing about certain worldview. I chose to call it phenomenology, but you might call it what you please; perhaps 'Merlin's magnifying glass'. The important thing is that the chosen term should suggest that what is there feels and, & at the same time, is felt. & that between what is there & us there is not a gap but a sensitive coexistence. I offer three examples of such a sensitive coexistence based on the relation constructed between 'it' before 'me' & 'me' before 'it'. After all these considerations, instead of stating a clear set of conclusions, I invite you to try a similar approach in the hope that you succeed - unlike me. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2008 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2008 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • es (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issueNumber
  • 13 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • La lupa de Merlín (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Athenea Digital: Revista de Pensamiento e Investigacion Social, 2008, 13, 201-208 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-63385 ()