PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • The article outlines the historical contours of the peculiar and long-lived conception of sovereignty in the English tradition: the ‘King-in-Parliament’. After fixing its duration from at least the 15th (John Fortescue) to the early 20th century (Albert V. Dicey), the article traces its development in the 16th century (Henry VIII, Christopher Saint German, Thomas Smith), the attack on it in the 17th century by royalist policies on the one hand, and by republican policies on the other, its classic formulation as a mixed constitution by William Blackstone in the 18th century, and the critique of David Hume, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill and Walter Bagehot. The conclusions concern the specifics of the English/British political culture and the need to analyze political culture in a time frame of longue durée. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2010 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2010 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • de (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 2196-2103 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Die Souveränität des 'King-in-Parliament': ein Beitrag zur Geschichte politischer Kultur in England (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: ZPTh - Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie, 1, 2010, 2, 194-220 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-62414-9 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)