PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • In this paper, I discuss the Ostrich Nominalism. At first, I attempt a clarification of main theses of Devitt. In addition, I analyze whether this kind of nominalism can be considered a solution to the problem of universals. After arguing that this theory does not consider the problem of universals a pseudoproblem, I discuss three criticisms against Ostrich Nominalism. Ontological commitment is the topic of first criticism. I argue that this notion does not provide a sufficient ontological criterion. Later, I analyze the regress infinite argument. The ostrich nominalist argues that all relational solutions to the problem of universals have this problem. However, I advocate that infinite regress argument does not refute all relational solutions. Finally, I analyze an external criticism. Rodriguez-Pereyra maintains that ostrich nominalism cannot be understood as a truthmaking theory. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2018 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2018 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.31977/grirfi.v18i2.917 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • pt (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 2178-1036 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Uma análise do Nominalismo de Avestruz (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Griot: Revista de Filosofia, 18, 2018, 2, 435-447 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:volumeNumber
  • 18 (xsd:string)