PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • According to Alasdair MacIntyre, there are three problems that pervade most contemporary political struggles and which have not been given sufficient attention: a) there is a conceptual incommensurability of the adverse arguments in the debates; b) the ongoing arguments represent impersonal rational arguments; c) the conceptually distinct premises of the used arguments have a great diversity of historical origins. From these three settings and their consequences, we will apply MacIntyre's critical reasoning to a specific set of conflicting arguments in the field of multiculturalism. Our aim is to explore the different conceptions and principles that underlie the positions seen and also to make a balance on the communitarian justification for a multicultural political model. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2018 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2018 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.31977/grirfi.v18i2.980 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • pt (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 2178-1036 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Três objeções de Alasdair MacIntyre aplicadas ao debate multicultural (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Griot: Revista de Filosofia, 18, 2018, 2, 217-232 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:volumeNumber
  • 18 (xsd:string)