PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • Policies of the European Union cover a range of social, environmental and economic aspirations and the current environmental directives and laws have evolved from a suite of norms which have changed over time. These may be characterised loosely according to 'Three Ps': Practical, those taking an anthropocentric approach; Pure, those taking an ecocentric approach and Popular, those appealing to the general public. In this paper I use these three perspectives as a tool to analyse the complexity and identify contradictions in European aquatic environmental legislation. Some trade-offs between development and conservation are identified and used to characterise the potential qualities of more successful agency to achieve environmental goals in the governance of European aquatic environments. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2017 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2017 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.12924/cis2017.05010043 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 2297-6477 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • You Can't Eat Biodiversity: Agency and Irrational Norms in European Aquatic Environmental Law (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Challenges in Sustainability, 5, 2017, 1, 43-51 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:volumeNumber
  • 5 (xsd:string)