PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • Empirical data gathered from surveys of MPs & interest groups in Slovenia reveal that the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia is a relatively powerful & accessible political institution. Parliamentary working bodies are perceived by MPs & interest groups as the focal point of their contacts. While MPs find interest groups to be both valuable sources of input into the legislative process & relatively influential policy actors, interest groups are relatively happy with how accessible MPs are, though they are less happy with their own impact on parliamentary decision-making. Despite the direct exchange between MPs & interest groups, political parties still play an important gatekeeping role. The identified factors of the impact of interest groups on the legislative process include the formally defined roles & competencies of parliamentary working bodies, policy sector variations, European interest-group networking, & the leadership styles of those who chair the working bodies. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2005 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2005 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issueNumber
  • 3 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Is Consultation Everything? The Influence of Interest Groups on Parliamentary Working Bodies in Slovenia (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 41, 2005, 3, 401-421 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54755 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 41 (xsd:string)