PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • Pension reform seems inevitable in postcommunist Central-Eastern Europe, because the process of economic transformation is greatly straining existing security systems. The different pension reform experiences of Poland, Hungary, & the Czech Republic are comparatively analyzed, focusing on the relationship between the relevant set of political actors, the respective structural settings, & the resulting institutional choice in old-age security, shedding light on the political economy of pension reform in the region. It is revealed that neither the sole reform of public pay-as-you-go schemes nor their replacement by mandatory private fully funded systems has proved to be a suitable reform option in itself. Rather, hybrid schemes that combine elements of both systems represent the most viable alternative both politically & economically. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 1999 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 1999 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issueNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Pension Reform Paths in Comparison: the Case of Central-Eastern Europe (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 7, 1999, 1, 51-66 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54356 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 7 (xsd:string)