PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • This commentary traces key issues attaching to the use of the word ‘public’ within planning practices and theories. It argues for an alternative, non-binary engagement with public practices that may profit from being cast in a Foucauldian language and epistemology. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.17645/up.v1i1.599 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 2183-7635 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Planning in/for/with the Public (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Stellungnahme (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:volumeNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)