PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • Three limitations in standard method measurement of income redistribution are considered: (1) redistribution is seen as a matter of global rather than marginal effects, (2) structural effects on the distribution of factor income are not accounted for, & (3) cross-section & life-cycle effects are conflated. Evidence from recent research is introduced, & it is argued that standard method results are reasonably robust in spite of limitations in the methodology. A positive association in advanced industrial companies between tax/transfer policy & income inequality is contended to be a firmly established conclusion, which suggests that if government wants to modify income inequality, it has a tool for so doing in tax & transfer policy, & if it should want to reshape transfers or taxes for other reasons, it must expect distributional consequences. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 1996 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 1996 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issueNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Can Inequality Be Reformed? (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:reference
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 4, 1996, 1, 19-28 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54026 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 4 (xsd:string)