PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • Objective: to validate the content of the operational definitions of the construct "non-acceptance to hypertension treatment". Method: a methodological study of content validation. It was performed an integrative review that showed four dimensions of nonacceptance: person, disease/treatment, health care and environment. Thirty-six operational definitions were developed in the context of these dimensions. The settings were evaluated by a panel of 17 experts. The Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated for each operational definition, and the binomial test was performed. Results: among the 36 developed operational definitions, 20 were validated with excellent IVC (≥0,81) with p<0,005; 11 suffered adjustments and were re-evaluated, five were excluded. Conclusion: the design and validation of these operational definitions as a specific event of nursing contribute to the consolidation of attributes of concepts that ultimately foresee the demarcation of nursing science. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.9789/2175-5361.2016.v8i3.4651-4658 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 2175-5361 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 3 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Content validation of the operational definitions of non-acceptance to hypertension treatment (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Revista de Pesquisa: Cuidado é Fundamental Online, 8, 2016, 3, 4651-4658 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-53705-3 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 8 (xsd:string)