PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • The article examined the dispute about the ideas between Aristotle and Plato as one of the cause of start of postmodern philosophy. Aristotle identified the idea (eidos) and form, which is cause of equating of the reality of the discourse and immanentization of being and apology of hedonism and the ambition of pleasure. The absence of a dialectical relationship between form and substance in the philosophy of Aristotle, and, in fact, the equation things and its form, that provides the degeneration of the original ideas in the simulacrum. Plato's opinion differed from the opinion of the opinion about the ideas of Aristotle. The idea determines the form of things, but not identical to it. The idea is transcendent, but not immanent of things. Aristotle's philosophy in its historical and philosophical deployment provided absence of truth, but not its being. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • ru (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 2311-8814 ()
?:linksURN
?:location
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Идеи Платона и эйдосы Аристотеля в контексте постмодернистской философии (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceCollection
  • Philosophy Reseach (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Nauka - rastudent.ru., 26, 2016, 13 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-52168-4 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 26 (xsd:string)