PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • A U.S. missile strike against the Assad regime in response to a suspected chemical weapons attack may have lessened a fear of Russia among countries that nominally back the Syrian opposition. Renewed U.S. diplomatic engagement in Syria could relieve pressure on the opposition to accept a settlement at the Geneva talks, which would be little more than a facelift of the Alawite-dominated regime. The international environment has lacked the balance to redress the disenfranchisement of Syria's majority Sunni population - a root cause of the war. European states hope to employ their reconstruction funding capacity. But stabilization remains far-fetched without a political transition and an inclusive system that can end the Assad clan's monopoly on power. (Autorenreferat) (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2017 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2017 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:issn
  • 1861-1761 ()
?:linksURN
?:location
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Syria's sectarian quandary: without solving Sunni dispossession, the Geneva talks skirt around the conflict (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Stellungnahme (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51955-7 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 12/2017 (xsd:string)