PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • Economists and other interested academics have committed significant time and effort to developing a set of circumstances under which an intelligent and circumspect form of racial profiling can serve as an effective tool in crime finding-the specific objective of finding criminal activity afoot. In turn, anti-profiling advocates tend to focus on the immediate efficacy of the practice, the morality of the practice, and/or the legality of the practice. However, the tenor of this opposition invites racial profiling proponents to develop more surgical profiling techniques to employ in crime finding. In the article, I review the literature on group distinction to discern its relevance to the practice and study of racial profiling. I argue that the costs of racial profiling extend beyond inefficient policing and the humiliation of law-abiding minority pedestrians and drivers. Racial profiling is simultaneously a process of perception and articulation of relative human characteristics (both positive and negative); it binds and reifies the concepts of race and criminality, fixing them into the subconscious of the profiled, the profiler, and society at large. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2014 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2014 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.17645/si.v2i3.126 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 2183-2803 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 3 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Racial profiling as collective definition (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Social Inclusion, 2, 2014, 3, 52-59 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:volumeNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)