PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • By the end of 1970s, transitology, or the study of the transformations following the breakdown of dictatorial regimes, became a sub-discipline of political science. Various theoretical perspectives oriented the analysis toward different factors that could decisively influence political change and transition: the economic and cultural prerequisites, the weight of the recent past, the extrication-path from dictatorship or the international setting. This article examines critically the main currents of transitology in order to re-evaluate their heuristic capacity, their interpretative limits and their methodological difficulties. It stands for rethinking the paradigms of political transition, towards a multidimensional model of analysis of political change, more sensitive to the local specificities and to the dynamic of transformations on the long term. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2012 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2012 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • fr (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 1582-4551 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 3 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Une analyse critique de la transitologie: valeurs heuristiques, limites d'interprétation et difficultés méthodologiques (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 12, 2012, 3, 485-504 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-446149 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 12 (xsd:string)