PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • Ladislav Holy argues in this paper that by virtue of the self-defining character of human activities, anthropological interpretation could proceed only on the basis of understanding indigenous categories and analysing activities in terms of those categories; imposition of outsiders’ analytic categories onto local concerns would only lead to confused analyses and the distorted representation of local systems of knowledge. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2014 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2014 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 1804-0616 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 1 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Knowledge and behavior (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Historická sociologie / Historical Sociology, 2014, 1, 9-24 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-414913 ()