PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • The claim of the present article is that human mortality makes a case for the discovery of the immortal nature of the person. Based on a clear distinction of the concepts of the human being and the person, human beings and persons are considered immortal insofar as both entities evidently do not qualify for a definition as living systems. On the one hand, human beings are presented as neither lifeless nor living systems. On the other hand, persons are introduced as lifeless systems and, as a result, immortal system. This claim is extended by the statement that, even if supposed to be living systems, persons could be considered at least potentially immortal, which is illustrated by a brief and proxy case of the person of Karl Marx. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2013 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2013 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 1532-5555 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Dying is only human: the case death makes for the immortality of the person (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Tamara : Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 11, 2013, 2, 37-41 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-412279 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 11 (xsd:string)