PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • "We argue that the so-called Digital Humanities fail to meet conventional criteria to be an accredited field of study on a par with Literature, Chemistry, Computer Science, and Civil Engineering, or even a specialized professorial emphasis such as Ancient History or Nuclear Physics. The argument uses long-term digital preservation as an example to argue that Digital Humanities proponents' case for their research agenda does not merit financial support, emphasizing practical aspects over subjective theory." (author's abstract) (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2012 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2012 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.12759/hsr.37.2012.3.201-217 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 0172-6404 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 3 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Long-term digital preservation: a digital humanities topic? (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Historical Social Research, 37, 2012, 3, 201-217 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-378921 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 37 (xsd:string)