PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • "In the early economic writings economics is seen as an efficient tool to commit moral values. Nevertheless the modern interpretation of classical economists uses their ideas to line up a moral-free economic theory. In this way the modern interpretation of classical economic theory is based at least on three fundamental misunderstandings: first a historical misunderstanding, i.e. the belief, that classical economic theory is a result of a development from moral science to economic science, second a theoretical misunderstanding, i.e. the assumption, that classical economic theory is designed as a model for social structures in whole society, and third a conceptual misunderstanding, i.e. the opinion, that classical theory has sketched a normative ideal that should guide political rules. It can be shown, that none of these interpretations is actually based on classical theory." (author's abstract) (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2006 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2006 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • de (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 1439-880X ()
?:issueNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Vom „klassischen Irrtum“ der Neoklassik: Kritische Anmerkungen zur Klassikeradaption im modernen Ökonomieverständnis (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 7, 2006, 2, 206-222 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-357323 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 7 (xsd:string)