PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • Why should social inequality be the topic of a session of a history congress rather than of a meeting of sociologists and, hence, a section of this book by historians rather than by sociologists? Why should one raise the issue of social inequality in a period of deep worldwide economic crisis in which the general public is interested in other themes and in which social inequality is often considered as a preoccupation of the past economic boom ? Why should social inequality be treated in a series of papers on quantitative history after having become so much a preoccupation of intellectual history and of ideological debates? I shall briefly answer these important and unavoidable questions, then cover the definition as well as some ideas on the long-term change of social inequality and finally say something about the three cases which are dealt with in the following papers, i. e. Sweden, Poland, and the U.S. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 1987 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 1987 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:editor
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isbn
  • 3-922661-40-8 ()
?:linksURN
?:location
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Social inequality in the 19th and 20th centuries: some introductory remarks (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Sammelwerksbeitrag (xsd:string)
  • in_proceedings (en)
?:publisher
?:sourceCollection
  • Quantitative history of society and economy: some international studies (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Quantitative history of society and economy: some international studies, Scripta Mercaturae Verl., St. Katharinen, 1987, 49-57 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-340989 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 21 (xsd:string)